Teams

Hit Happy/Van Slyke/Pleasanton

2025 Tri-Level 3.5 · 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-18vs Big Backhand/Holm/SunnyvaleLost 03
L#1 DoublesJoanna Broda-Schunck / Kiran F Narsinh vs Veeraya Pupatwibul / Winnie Zhang1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBarbara Sullivan / Tricia Jacob vs Yiwen Xie / Alicia Li3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesLauren Federgreen / Sandrine Chobert vs Puhe Liang / Yuewei Wang1-6, 2-6
2025-10-18vs Bag O Tricks/Gottlib/PleasantonWon 21
L#1 DoublesSarah Stewart / Kiran F Narsinh vs Lisa Oktavia / Sunny Hong6-0, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTricia Jacob / Mary Carse vs Sharon Gottlib / Heather Houston6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLauren Federgreen / Sandrine Chobert vs Jing Vasseghi / Tiffany Tran-Carper6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 DoublesSarah Stewart / Jill Van Slyke vs Nicole Bianchi / Lisa Trusheim7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBarbara Sullivan / Tricia Jacob vs Lisa Eastlack / Jennifer Holmes6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCindy Mark / Sandrine Chobert vs Tori Herzog / Melinda Whitmore0-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-10-17vs Court Queens/Parise/SunnyvaleLost 12
L#1 DoublesJoanna Broda-Schunck / Jill Van Slyke vs Kathryn Aguilar / Puja Mukherjee2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBarbara Sullivan / Mary Carse vs Teresa King / Vanessa Garcia3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHannah Kim / Cindy Mark vs Dorita Castillano / Sridevi Parise5-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bec Heinrich
published 4.5
4.22
Kiran F Narsinh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.96
Tricia Jacob
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Joanna Broda-Schunck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Jill Van Slyke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Sarah Stewart
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Mary Carse
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Sandrine Chobert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Cindy Mark
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joanna Broda-Schunck + Jill Van Slyke134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Bec Heinrich
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kiran F Narsinh
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
4.22
Tricia Jacob
29W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.96
Joanna Broda-Schunck
5W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
3.83
Jill Van Slyke
7W–49L career · 2 lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
3.81
Sarah Stewart
20W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
3.73
Mary Carse
16W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
Sandrine Chobert
10W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Cindy Mark
15W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.