Teams

The Grand Slammers/Shalev/San Rafael

2025 Tri-Level 3.5 · 4.0

10 players · average NTRP / NO. CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-18vs SFTC/Lu/San FranciscoLost 03
L#1 DoublesLisa Trusheim / Elizabeth Shalev vs Lizzie Siegle / Helen Zhang6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Holmes / Lisa Eastlack vs Sandy Shepherd / Anthea Pang1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesTori Herzog / Melinda Whitmore vs Paulina Gebska / Jess Sterrett2-6, 0-6
2025-10-18vs Unforced Fun/Stephens/San MateoWon 30
W#1 DoublesRobin Gluck / Elizabeth Shalev vs Nicole Stephens / Kiyoe Hashimoto6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLynn Graham / Karen Fairty vs Michele Lindzy / Lisa Kesler2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKatie Ward / Laura Hoppe vs Tonya Vincent / Sherri Glenn6-4, 6-3
2025-10-17vs Hit Happy/Van Slyke/PleasantonWon 21
W#1 DoublesNicole Bianchi / Lisa Trusheim vs Sarah Stewart / Jill Van Slyke5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Eastlack / Jennifer Holmes vs Barbara Sullivan / Tricia Jacob2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTori Herzog / Melinda Whitmore vs Cindy Mark / Sandrine Chobert6-0, 5-7, 1-0
2025-10-17vs Game.Set.Snack/Tan/SunnyvaleWon 30
W#1 DoublesRobin Gluck / Elizabeth Shalev vs Anusha Arcalgud / Jenny Wang6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKaren Fairty / Lynn Graham vs Joany Gao / Emily Ling1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKatie Ward / Laura Hoppe vs Chang Geng / Elaine Zhao7-5, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Robin Gluck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.26
Elizabeth Shalev
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.96
Lisa Trusheim
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
Nicole Bianchi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.88
Lisa Eastlack
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
Karen Fairty
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Laura Hoppe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Lynn Graham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Tori Herzog
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Melinda Whitmore
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melinda Whitmore + Tori Herzog9553% games+1.6% vs expected
Lynn Graham + Karen Fairty5349% games−2.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robin Gluck
14W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.27
Elizabeth Shalev
13W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.26
Lisa Trusheim
13W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.96
Nicole Bianchi
8W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
73%27%<1%
3.92
Lisa Eastlack
39W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
Karen Fairty
16W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.85
Laura Hoppe
17W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.79
Lynn Graham
19W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Tori Herzog
29W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
Melinda Whitmore
17W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.