Teams

2-KTodd - Eno-18+ 3.5

2022 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women Evening

6 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-07-20vs 4-SFranks-Eno-18+3.5Lost 01
L#2 SinglesKatherine Beall vs Laurie Straube2-6, 2-6
2022-07-18vs 6-CPeterson-HVCCWon 10
W#3 SinglesHolly Atkinson vs Cecily Peterson6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2022-07-06Lost 01
L#2 SinglesHolly Atkinson vs Kiya Penzien6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-06-29vs 4-SFranks-Eno-18+3.5Lost 01
L#2 SinglesKatherine Beall vs Megan Chiles1-6, 3-6
2022-06-27vs 1-SBrogden-Eno-18+Lost 02
L#1 SinglesKatherine Beall vs Deb Lanier4-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesHolly Atkinson vs Martha Clippinger4-6, 6-7
2022-06-20Won 10
W#3 SinglesKatherine Beall vs Joselyn McDonald6-3, 6-4
2022-06-20vs 6-CPeterson-HVCCLost 01
L#3 SinglesKatherine Beall vs Cecily Peterson6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2022-06-13vs 3-MLong-Eno-18+ 3.5Won 10
W#3 SinglesHolly Atkinson vs Peggi Hunter6-0, 6-2
2022-06-01vs 1-SBrogden-Eno-18+Lost 01
L#3 SinglesKatherine Beall vs Martha Clippinger5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Abby Olmsted
published 3.5
3.47
Laura Williams
published
3.42
Jennifer Smythe
published 3.5
3.17
Katie Masood
published
3.11
Holly Atkinson
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.93
Katherine Beall
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Abby Olmsted
4W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%18%82%
3.62
Laura Williams
11W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Jennifer Smythe
42W–48L career · no lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.42
Katie Masood
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Holly Atkinson
253W–179L career · 4 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.11
3
Katherine Beall
50W–56L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
2.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.