Teams

MOUNTAIN VIEW TC/RENGSTORFF PK 40AM4.0A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Men's 4.0

16 players · average NTRP 4.20 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Men's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
4.24
Andy Ewing
published 4.5
4.03
Amir Yazdi
published 4
3.96
Gaurav Malhotra
published 4
3.94
Alain Raynaud
published 4.5
3.87
Ryan Low
published
3.87
Wade Conklin
published
3.81
Seth Hazen
published
3.73
3.72
Benny Barbero
published 4
3.70
Vinod Srinivasan
published
3.66
Raghu Bhat
published
3.64
Jeffrey Cannon
published
3.54
Kumar Kandaswamy
published
3.41
Sharad Santhanam
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natarajan Choodamani + Andy Ewing2345% games−2.7% vs expected
Vinod Srinivasan + Jeffrey Cannon123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natarajan Choodamani
8W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
4.29
4.5
Andy Ewing
17W–8L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.24
4
Amir Yazdi
12W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
4.03
4
Gaurav Malhotra
20W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.96
4.5
Alain Raynaud
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
3.94
Ryan Low
59W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.87
Wade Conklin
19W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.87
Seth Hazen
24W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
Muralidharan Jayavelan
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Benny Barbero
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.72
Vinod Srinivasan
21W–11L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
Raghu Bhat
17W–20L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.66
Jeffrey Cannon
19W–22L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.64
Kumar Kandaswamy
17W–18L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.54
Sharad Santhanam
0W–9L career · no lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
3.41
Prajval Parthasarathy
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.