Teams

Fischels ES 2024

2024 MIXED 18 & OVER EARLY START · 8.0 MX (SUN)

10 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-12-03vs Rudser/YeeLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrian Reidinger / Dawn Reidinger vs Jennifer Christie / William Connelly3-6, 5-7
2023-11-19vs Bartz/Buckman ES 8.0 MixedLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrian Reidinger / Rebecca Johnson vs Marisa Simonetti / Jack Butler2-6, 5-7
2023-11-12vs HENRICH/VON SEGGERNWon 10
W#3 DoublesBrian Reidinger / Rebecca Johnson vs Boris Gonikman / Caroline Agre7-6, 6-3
2023-11-05vs Goodwin: Net AssetsLost 01
L#2 DoublesKathleen Farmer / Brian Reidinger vs Margaret Creighton / Karl Lovaas0-6, 0-6
2023-10-22vs Tretsven/Cammack Early StartLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrian Reidinger / Angela Fischels vs Patrice Meger / Courtland Farrell3-6, 2-6
2023-10-15vs Bartz/Buckman ES 8.0 MixedWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrian Reidinger / Patricia White vs Ruben Suare / Janelle Percy7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2023-10-01vs Ostlund 8.0 Early StartLost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid Neis / Kathleen Farmer vs Kerry Reiling / SCOTT HOWARD7-6, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 MX (SUN) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Eric Bender
published
3.96
Brandon Schaner
published 4
3.81
David Neis
published 4
3.74
Brian Reidinger
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.67
Angela Fischels
published 4
3.61
Jon Swanson
published
3.59
Patricia White
published
3.34
Dawn Reidinger
published 3.5
3.25
Beth Turnbull
published 3.5
Kathleen Farmer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dawn Reidinger + Brian Reidinger82142% games+1.8% vs expected
Patricia White + David Neis51043% games−8.3% vs expected
Angela Fischels + David Neis1440% games−9.7% vs expected
Angela Fischels + Jon Swanson2645% gamesnot enough data
Angela Fischels + Brian Reidinger134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Eric Bender
8W–11L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
4.16
4
Brandon Schaner
9W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.96
4
David Neis
11W–21L career · type M · no lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.81
4
Brian Reidinger
92W–175L career · 10 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Angela Fischels
46W–79L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
Jon Swanson
12W–26L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.61
Patricia White
42W–69L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.59
3.5
Dawn Reidinger
111W–146L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Beth Turnbull
2W–7L career · type M · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.25
Kathleen Farmer
75W–85L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.