Teams

Ostlund 8.0 Early Start

2024 MIXED 18 & OVER EARLY START · 8.0 MX (SUN)

15 players · average NTRP 4.08 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-12-10Won 10
W#3 DoublesKerry Reiling / Per Ostlund vs Carly Hayes / Niklas Jorve7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2023-12-03vs Goodwin: Net AssetsLost 01
L#2 DoublesKerry Reiling / Per Ostlund vs Yuko Goodwin / James Livesey5-7, 4-6
2023-10-01vs Fischels ES 2024Won 10
W#3 DoublesKerry Reiling / SCOTT HOWARD vs David Neis / Kathleen Farmer6-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 MX (SUN) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Charlie Race
published 4.5
4.16
Kristin Heywood
published
4.13
Lea Blackwell Favor
published
4.09
Cameron Sloan
published 4.5
3.92
Leif Johnson
published
3.88
Kerry Reiling
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.87
Lynda Stout
published
3.83
Cathy Paper
published 4
3.73
3.73
3.70
Stephanie Crowl
published
3.57
Per Ostlund
published
3.53
SCOTT HOWARD
published
3.33
Beth Ann Sloan
published 3.5
Felix Diehn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cameron Sloan + Beth Ann Sloan5157% games+16.3% vs expected
Leif Johnson + Lynda Stout7452% games+0.3% vs expected
Cameron Sloan + Alexis Siegel-Carlson314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Charlie Race
31W–33L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
4.21
Kristin Heywood
10W–6L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
4.16
Lea Blackwell Favor
46W–38L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
4.13
4.5
Cameron Sloan
28W–11L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
4.09
Leif Johnson
39W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.92
4
Kerry Reiling
252W–157L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
3.88
Lynda Stout
55W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.87
4
Cathy Paper
45W–35L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Alexis Siegel-Carlson
26W–41L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Megan Murray-Bennett
50W–34L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%2%
3.73
Stephanie Crowl
34W–47L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.70
Per Ostlund
14W–42L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.57
SCOTT HOWARD
17W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Beth Ann Sloan
19W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Felix Diehn
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.