Teams

CP RED

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.21 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-31vs DTC PURPLELost 04
L#1 DoublesAmy Twardowski / Lena Ursten Hobbs vs Kristin Bokelman / Sarah Hart5-7, 5-7
L#1 SinglesEmily Sherman vs Elaine Golden Webster6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Schindler / KRISTEN ALIX vs Elaina Grauer / Jennifer Monks0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLauren Hanzlik / Annalisa Averill vs Sheila Tsai / Krista Yamamoto5-7, 5-7
2022-05-31vs WP PINKLost 23
W#1 DoublesDeborah Clark / Julie Schindler vs Kristin Nelson / Kara Gwinn4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesEmily Sherman vs Katie Portenga4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLena Ursten Hobbs / Susan Pesso vs Stephanie Baur / Justine McKinzie7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesLauren Hanzlik vs Christine Johnson6-0, 7-5
L#3 DoublesKRISTEN ALIX / Annalisa Averill vs Brooke Webb / Valerie Kilzer3-6, 4-6
2022-05-22vs GTC REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesLena Ursten Hobbs / Julie Schindler vs Karen Ryan / Maureen Clarke5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Twardowski / Lauren Hanzlik vs AMY SITZE / Cyndie Miller6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesSusan Pesso vs Cindy Miller3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAnnalisa Averill / KRISTEN ALIX vs Cindy Wright / Laura High3-6, 2-6
2022-05-16vs GTC PINKSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSusan Pesso / Lena Ursten Hobbs vs Brenda Emerson / Julie Woodle6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDeborah Clark / Amy Twardowski vs Sara Springer / Jessica Mills1-0
W#2 SinglesEmily Sherman vs Liza Baker7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKRISTEN ALIX / Lauren Hanzlik vs Ellen Lee / Yvette Dolan3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-05-09vs EM YELLOWWon 31
W#1 DoublesLena Ursten Hobbs / Susan Pesso vs Dana Keefe / Janet Willson6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJulie Schindler / KRISTEN ALIX vs Meg Overstake / Rebecca Winslow3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesEmily Sherman vs Tammy Terhaar6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLauren Hanzlik / Annalisa Averill vs Susan Engeman / Kathy Klein6-4, 6-3
2022-04-25vs CM NAVYWon 32
W#1 DoublesLena Ursten Hobbs / Susan Pesso vs Kerri Holman / Megan Robert6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesEmily Sherman vs Mary Fitzpatrick6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKelly Parker / Lauren Hanzlik vs Lydia Tzagoloff / Aileen Worden7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAmy Twardowski vs Meghan Wolfe4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJulie Schindler / KRISTEN ALIX vs Leslie Madsen / Beth Hasse6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-04-18vs APR BLUELost 23
L#1 DoublesDeborah Clark / Lena Ursten Hobbs vs Danielle Remington / Molly Garg4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAmy Twardowski vs Adele Norton5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSusan Pesso / Julie Schindler vs Sheri Jacobs / Peguy Servelion6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesEmily Sherman vs Stephany Jewell7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLauren Hanzlik / Annalisa Averill vs Jessica Rae / Andrea Woolley3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Lauren Hanzlik
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.54
Annalisa Averill
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Lena Ursten Hobbs
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
2.85
Susan Pesso
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Amy Twardowski
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
Emily Sherman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.56
KRISTEN ALIX
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
April Leahy
published 2.5
Julie Schindler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Annalisa Averill + Lauren Hanzlik11367% games+10.3% vs expected
Amy Twardowski + KRISTEN ALIX2547% games−3.0% vs expected
Lena Ursten Hobbs + Susan Pesso4252% games−4.2% vs expected
April Leahy + Amy Twardowski5255% gamesnot enough data
Julie Schindler + Susan Pesso4165% gamesnot enough data
Julie Schindler + Amy Twardowski213 matchesnot enough data
Julie Schindler + KRISTEN ALIX123 matchesnot enough data
Susan Pesso + KRISTEN ALIX033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lauren Hanzlik
101W–28L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.82
3.5
Annalisa Averill
81W–26L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Lena Ursten Hobbs
179W–121L career · type A · 7 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
Susan Pesso
42W–27L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Amy Twardowski
68W–36L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Emily Sherman
21W–3L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
KRISTEN ALIX
24W–38L career · 6 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
2.56
2.5
April Leahy
9W–18L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Julie Schindler
32W–21L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.