Teams

GTC RED

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 2.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-30vs DTC PURPLELost 04
L#1 DoublesAMY SITZE / Laura High vs Kimberly Montgomery / Kristin Bokelman1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMaureen Clarke / Karen Ryan vs Krista Yamamoto / Sheila Tsai0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesCyndie Miller vs Natasha Gallaway0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAshley Stevens / Cindy Wright vs Alison Morrison / Elaina Grauer1-6, 1-6
2022-05-24vs CM NAVYSplit 22
W#1 DoublesCyndie Miller / AMY SITZE vs Jennifer I / Kerri Holman7-6, 6-1
L#1 SinglesCindy Miller vs Hannah Sloven5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMaureen Clarke / Karen Ryan vs Beth Hasse / Leslie Madsen6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCindy Wright / Gwendolyn Bradshaw vs Aileen Worden / Alison Thompson2-6, 1-6
2022-05-23vs GTC PINKLost 12
L#2 DoublesKaren Ryan / Maureen Clarke vs Brenda Emerson / Julie Woodle2-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesCindy Miller vs Liza Baker6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAshley Stevens / Cindy Wright vs Ellen Lee / Yvette Dolan2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-05-22vs CP REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesKaren Ryan / Maureen Clarke vs Lena Ursten Hobbs / Julie Schindler7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAMY SITZE / Cyndie Miller vs Amy Twardowski / Lauren Hanzlik2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesCindy Miller vs Susan Pesso6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCindy Wright / Laura High vs Annalisa Averill / KRISTEN ALIX6-3, 6-2
2022-05-16vs EM YELLOWLost 13
L#1 DoublesLaura High / Maureen Clarke vs Meg Overstake / Rebecca Winslow4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCyndie Miller / AMY SITZE vs Susan Engeman / Kathy Klein7-6, 7-5
L#2 SinglesKaren Ryan vs Lisa Allen4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesCindy Wright / Gwendolyn Bradshaw vs Dana Keefe / Lindsey MClintock3-6, 1-6
2022-05-01vs APR BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesKaren Ryan / Jennifer Kaufman vs Danielle Remington / Molly Garg4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesCindy Miller vs Adele Norton2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGwendolyn Bradshaw / Cindy Wright vs Peguy Servelion / Jessica Rae2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesCyndie Miller / AMY SITZE vs Andrea Woolley / Cherlyn Linden6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2022-04-30vs WP PINKWon 32
L#1 DoublesLaura High / Dianne Johnson-Pape vs Brooke Webb / Kara Gwinn2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKaren Ryan vs Katie Portenga1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCyndie Miller / AMY SITZE vs Justine McKinzie / Abby Laverick6-0, 7-5
W#2 SinglesCindy Miller vs Neda Rasouli6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAshley Stevens / Maureen Clarke vs Calee Lee / Shanna Weber6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Cindy Miller
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
Cyndie Miller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3
2.71
AMY SITZE
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Ashley Stevens
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.59
Maureen Clarke
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.49
Karen Ryan
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.13
Gwendolyn Bradshaw
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.03
Dianne Johnson-Pape
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Laura High
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cyndie Miller + AMY SITZE552257% games+1.9% vs expected
Karen Ryan + Maureen Clarke82144% games−0.6% vs expected
Karen Ryan + AMY SITZE3344% games−5.4% vs expected
Ashley Stevens + Gwendolyn Bradshaw01024% games−15.5% vs expected
Cindy Miller + Dianne Johnson-Pape044 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Stevens + Maureen Clarke213 matchesnot enough data
Gwendolyn Bradshaw + Maureen Clarke213 matchesnot enough data
Gwendolyn Bradshaw + Laura High033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cindy Miller
15W–32L career · type A · 5 lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Cyndie Miller
71W–51L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
AMY SITZE
71W–42L career · 6 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.71
3
Ashley Stevens
30W–42L career · 3 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
Maureen Clarke
28W–56L career · 6 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
2.59
Karen Ryan
22W–64L career · 7 lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
2.49
2.5
Gwendolyn Bradshaw
5W–38L career · type S · 3 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.13
2.5
Dianne Johnson-Pape
5W–30L career · 1 line in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.03
Laura High
9W–19L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.