Teams

Fiddlers Creek / Farnham

2025 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-02-28vs Hammock Bay / TrzcinskiLost 01
L#1 DoublesBetsy Conte / Odette Kardek vs Cheryl Trzcinski / Ann Casaday3-6, 2-6
2025-02-21vs Eagle CreekWon 10
W#1 DoublesBetsy Conte / Odette Kardek vs Annette Tuebner / Fiona Heneghan6-3, 6-3
2025-01-24vs Isles Of Collier / M.YoungLost 01
L#2 DoublesBetsy Conte / Laura Farnham vs Monique Berlinger / Susan Ward3-6, 3-6
2025-01-17vs Hammock Bay / TrzcinskiLost 12
L#1 DoublesPaulina Gillies / Odette Kardek vs Ann Casaday / Jacquie Currie2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGail Gattas / Kerry Turner vs Susan Gruber / Cheryl Trzcinski3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLaura Farnham / Dawn Jones vs Jennifer Currie / Aafke Loney6-1, 7-5
2025-01-10vs Fiddlers Creek / McNamaraWon 30
W#1 DoublesLaura Farnham / Kerry Turner vs Jane Rudy / Gina Flanigan6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCarole Sloan / Gail Gattas vs Stacy Harvey / Melissa Melvin6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesFran Allen / Theresa Winslow vs Lisa McNamara / Marybeth Ray6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Odette Kardek
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Kerry Turner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Gail Gattas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Fran Allen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Betsy Conte
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.71
Carole Sloan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Laura Farnham
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.67
Theresa Winslow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Paulina Gillies
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kerry Turner + Odette Kardek4546% games+7.3% vs expected
Laura Farnham + Gail Gattas0731% gamesnot enough data
Gail Gattas + Carole Sloan3345% gamesnot enough data
Laura Farnham + Carole Sloan044 matchesnot enough data
Kerry Turner + Carole Sloan314 matchesnot enough data
Laura Farnham + Kerry Turner123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Odette Kardek
13W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
Kerry Turner
16W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Gail Gattas
6W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Fran Allen
13W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Betsy Conte
212W–172L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Carole Sloan
9W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
5%94%1%
2.71
Laura Farnham
10W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%92%1%
2.69
Theresa Winslow
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
2.67
Paulina Gillies
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.