Teams

Hammock Bay / Trzcinski

2025 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.12 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-02-07vs Fiddlers Creek / McNamaraWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnn Casaday / Erica Wallis vs Jolene Baltzer / Lisa McNamara6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPaula Crane / Alisa Metal vs Christine Salmon / Sue Oliver1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaura Hansmann / Elisabeth Sajed vs Aynsley Helwer / Dany Theuerkauf6-1, 6-1
2025-01-31vs Eagle CreekWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnn Casaday / Susan Gruber vs Sarah Preusker / Christine Shaw6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLaura Hansmann / Alisa Metal vs Annette Tuebner / Lori Brooks6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAafke Loney / Jennifer Currie vs Connie Poirier / Ann Englert6-4, 6-2
L#1 DoublesAnn Casaday / Jacquie Currie vs Jamey Moore / Michele Pallone2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesPaula Crane / Cheryl Trzcinski vs Claire Babrowski / Grace Allmaier6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2025-01-17vs Fiddlers Creek / FarnhamWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnn Casaday / Jacquie Currie vs Paulina Gillies / Odette Kardek6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSusan Gruber / Cheryl Trzcinski vs Gail Gattas / Kerry Turner6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJennifer Currie / Aafke Loney vs Laura Farnham / Dawn Jones1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ann Casaday
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Aafke Loney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Alisa Metal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Laura Hansmann
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.53
Cheryl Trzcinski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Elisabeth Sajed
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Erica Wallis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jacquie Currie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Currie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Paula Crane
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Stacey Taylor
published
Susan Gruber
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheryl Trzcinski + Paula Crane2642% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ann Casaday
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Aafke Loney
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Alisa Metal
7W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
Laura Hansmann
13W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.60
3
Cheryl Trzcinski
30W–70L career · 2 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
2.53
Elisabeth Sajed
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Erica Wallis
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jacquie Currie
10W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Currie
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paula Crane
6W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stacey Taylor
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Gruber
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.