Teams

Naples Grande - Gardner

2024 Collier Adult 40 & Over Winter · 4.0 Adult 40 & Over Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.94 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-02-27vs Naples Reserve - HugginsWon 20
W#1 DoublesKimberly DiStefano / Tracy Stuben vs Lynne Huggins / Tricia McBride5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCatherine Rigamer / Beth Jones vs Tam Pham / Nyra Rohskopf6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-02-20vs Heritage Bay - DelkSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCara Eichenlaub / Robin Inscho vs Jae Marie Fry / Megan MacKrory6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPeggy Hogan / Nancy Harbert vs Alexandra Fast / Julie Lenhart3-6, 3-6
2024-02-13vs World Tennis Club - JocWon 30
W#1 DoublesCatherine Rigamer / Beth Jones vs Gwendolyn Messonnier / Michele Nelson-Baker6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesKimberly DiStefano vs Liana Franke6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesWendy Garber / Sara Munholland vs Terry Dirr / Vesna Petrovic5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 DoublesCara Eichenlaub / Robin Inscho vs Ann Heinauer / Andrea Washak6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAmy Gardner / Kimberly DiStefano vs Marzenna Nowak / Bernadette DiPino3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKaryn Sardar / Nancy Harbert vs Rachel Schenk / Susanna Haedelt2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-01-31vs Pelican Marsh - BargerWon 30
W#1 DoublesCara Eichenlaub / Robin Inscho vs Tracy Maurer / Sunny Barger6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesWendy Garber / Kimberly DiStefano vs Diana Pleeter / Lauren Keillor6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCatherine Rigamer / Betsy Moreno Berger vs Marie Shoaf / Stacey Mondragon6-3, 6-3
2024-01-24vs Quail Creek - K. SteinLost 02
L#1 SinglesKristen Tessmar vs Mariya Rebreeva4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Harbert / Peggy Hogan vs Karen Hole / Candace Azad2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-01-23vs Olde Cypress - NavarroWon 30
W#1 DoublesCara Eichenlaub / Robin Inscho vs Aggie Rupert / Lori Caple6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCatherine Rigamer / Beth Jones vs Cheryl Toth / Kathleen Farmer7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKimberly DiStefano / Sara Munholland vs Susanne Navarro / Shelley Boggess6-0, 6-2
2024-01-09vs Naples Reserve - HugginsWon 30
W#1 DoublesKimberly DiStefano / Tracy Stuben vs Lynne Huggins / Tricia McBride6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNancy Harbert / Karyn Sardar vs Gina Garfunkel / Susan Julich6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesWendy Garber / Kristen Tessmar vs Ramsay Erickson / Susan Burgess5-7, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Sandee Kozel
published 4
4.05
Kristie McCormick
published
4.03
Robin Inscho
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.95
Kimberly DiStefano
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.92
Amy Gardner
published 4
3.88
Wendy Garber
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.81
Catherine Rigamer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.81
Sara Munholland
published
3.75
Michele Tesei
published
Beth Jones
published 4
3.68
Kristen Tessmar
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.41
Cheryl Ingram
published 3.5
Karyn Sardar
published
Katie Lober
published
Nancy Harbert
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Peggy Hogan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Garber + Kimberly DiStefano7170% games+3.4% vs expected
Robin Inscho + Kristen Tessmar341358% games+3.2% vs expected
Nancy Harbert + Karyn Sardar9162% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sandee Kozel
82W–27L career · no lines in 2024
<1%33%67%
4.06
Kristie McCormick
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
4.05
4
Robin Inscho
139W–47L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
4.03
4
Kimberly DiStefano
162W–61L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Amy Gardner
14W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
3.92
Wendy Garber
128W–93L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.88
4
Catherine Rigamer
75W–68L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%92%8%
3.81
Sara Munholland
9W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.81
Michele Tesei
53W–25L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Beth Jones
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Betsy Moreno Berger
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Kristen Tessmar
126W–83L career · 2 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Cheryl Ingram
116W–69L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.41
Karyn Sardar
22W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Katie Lober
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Harbert
148W–83L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Peggy Hogan
16W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.