Teams

HFTC - Good Vibrations

2022 HTA Spring NA - Ladies Doubles Tuesday · 4.0 Ladies Doubles

13 players · average NTRP 3.38 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Ladies Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
3.50
Frances Crouse
published 3.5
3.36
Diana Gano
published
3.35
Linda Jacobs
published
3.26
Carol Lewis
published 3.5
Anastacia Bynoe
published 3.5
3.14
Leslie Gonsalves
published
Annie Jenkins
published 3
Jill Martin
published
Melanie Wong
published
Phyllis Kirkland
published
Samantha Carpenter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Phyllis Kirkland + Leslie Gonsalves8549% games−4.3% vs expected
Carol Lewis + Anastacia Bynoe033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maria Glopil Pasamonte
9W–32L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Frances Crouse
21W–23L career · no lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
3.50
Diana Gano
5W–21L career · no lines in 2022
87%13%<1%
3.36
Linda Jacobs
47W–78L career · no lines in 2022
87%13%<1%
3.35
3.5
Carol Lewis
17W–56L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Anastacia Bynoe
4W–14L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Leslie Gonsalves
59W–89L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
3
Annie Jenkins
6W–19L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jill Martin
14W–23L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Melanie Wong
26W–26L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Phyllis Kirkland
26W–32L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Samantha Carpenter
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephanie Potisek Lee
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.