Teams

Western: Geary

2023 55&Over Mixed · 6.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.17 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-04-28vs DewittWon 21
L#1 DoublesSusan O'Brien / Danilo Fernando vs Barbara Crane / Joseph Branagan6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKenneth Geary / Renee de Nevers vs John Murray / Scarlett Davidson6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDiane Mantooth / Richard Hall vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-04-21vs DewittWon 20
W#1 DoublesKenneth Geary / Veronica Hotaling vs Joseph Branagan / Ami Longstreet6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJuliet Concilla / Richard Price vs Philip Luckette / Scarlett Davidson7-5, 6-2
2023-04-14vs DewittWon 30
W#1 DoublesSteve Brandt / Renee de Nevers vs Bruce Abend / Natalya Levin4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJohn Bonaccio / Mary Cawley-Oliver vs Scarlett Davidson / George Lawrence6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRichard Price / Susan O'Brien vs John Murray / Ami Longstreet6-2, 6-3
2023-03-31vs DewittWon 21
L#1 DoublesDiane Mantooth / Richard Hall vs Natalya Levin / Bruce Abend5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesDanilo Fernando / Lisa Campagna vs Valerie Clarke / Jack Clarkson6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMaiken Westergaard / Steve Brandt vs Philip Luckette / Deborah Severino6-2, 6-0
2023-03-25vs DewittWon 21
W#1 DoublesSteve Brandt / Veronica Hotaling vs Joseph Branagan / Anne Farella6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesGreg May / Juliet Concilla vs Jeffrey Friedman / Scarlett Davidson7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDanilo Fernando / Lisa Campagna vs John Murray / Ami Longstreet6-0, 6-1
2023-03-19vs DewittWon 21
W#1 DoublesRichard Price / Lisa Campagna vs Valerie Clarke / Jack Clarkson6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDanilo Fernando / Juliet Concilla vs Bruce Abend / Natalya Levin2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKenneth Geary / Veronica Hotaling vs George Lawrence / Barbara Crane6-2, 6-1
2023-03-12vs DewittWon 21
W#1 DoublesJohn Bonaccio / Juliet Concilla vs Anthony Farella / Anne Farella6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRichard Price / Maiken Westergaard vs Jeffrey Friedman / Scarlett Davidson7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesGreg May / Mary Cawley-Oliver vs Barbara Crane / Philip Luckette2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Western: Geary7015613132
2Dewitt0761532223

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Richard Price
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.22
Veronica Hotaling
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Lisa Campagna
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Danilo Fernando
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.10
Kenneth Geary
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.97
John Bonaccio
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.94
Steve Brandt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.91
Juliet Concilla
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.87
Diane Mantooth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Renee de Nevers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Greg May
published
Maiken Westergaard
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mary Cawley-Oliver
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Richard Hall
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Susan O'Brien
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Price + Maiken Westergaard12655% games−8.6% vs expected
Juliet Concilla + John Bonaccio4447% gamesnot enough data
Veronica Hotaling + Steve Brandt5359% gamesnot enough data
Juliet Concilla + Greg May7074% gamesnot enough data
Diane Mantooth + Steve Brandt5160% gamesnot enough data
Danilo Fernando + Juliet Concilla2347% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Campagna + Richard Hall2343% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Campagna + Richard Price3253% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Richard Price
58W–66L career · 5 lines in 2023
88%12%<1%
3.34
3.5
Veronica Hotaling
109W–60L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Lisa Campagna
90W–110L career · 6 lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.14
3
Danilo Fernando
50W–53L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%17%83%
3.12
3
Kenneth Geary
67W–81L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%22%78%
3.10
John Bonaccio
41W–34L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
2.97
Steve Brandt
74W–57L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Juliet Concilla
131W–137L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Diane Mantooth
24W–15L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%83%17%
2.87
Renee de Nevers
43W–61L career · 2 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
2.60
Greg May
19W–24L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Maiken Westergaard
44W–50L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Cawley-Oliver
19W–13L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Richard Hall
49W–62L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan O'Brien
54W–38L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.