Teams

NAZ/Cohen/40&over/3.5mixed

2026 Mixed 40 & Over - NAZ · NAZ 3.5 mixed

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-15vs KolodyLost 03
L#1 DoublesLaura Nicol / Derek Miller vs Michael Turner / Kathy Cox1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJill Grams / Rich Stephens vs Packy Baker / Julie Crow4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKim Vallen / Eli Cohen vs John Kolody / Caroline Austin-Mathur5-7, 4-6
2026-08-15vs KolodyWon 21
W#1 DoublesLaura Nicol / Steven Riggs vs Jennifer Bearchell / Michael Chan6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKristen Downs / Bob Guzley vs Michael Turner / Caroline Austin-Mathur5-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesKim Vallen / Derek Miller vs Eric Nielsen / Julie Crow6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · NAZ 3.5 mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NAZ/Cohen/40&over/3.5mixed7118615182
2Kolody3310818145
3Rice0621632210

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Steven Riggs
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.43
Kim Vallen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Talai Osmonbekov
published
3.35
Rich Stephens
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Becky Jones
published 3.5
3.29
Laura Nicol
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Kristen Downs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Bob Guzley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Eli Cohen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Kirsten Aamodt
published
3.06
Jill Grams
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Cynthia Weick
published 3.5
2.73
Johanna Steigerwald
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bob Guzley + Kristen Downs101050% games−1.9% vs expected
Rich Stephens + Jill Grams1448% gamesnot enough data
Kirsten Aamodt + Rich Stephens123 matchesnot enough data
Kristen Downs + Eli Cohen123 matchesnot enough data
Laura Nicol + Eli Cohen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Steven Riggs
64W–59L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.49
Kim Vallen
66W–53L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
Talai Osmonbekov
9W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.40
Rich Stephens
19W–52L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Becky Jones
14W–10L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
Laura Nicol
69W–51L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.29
Kristen Downs
56W–55L career · 1 line in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Bob Guzley
29W–52L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Eli Cohen
21W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
5%94%1%
3.21
Kirsten Aamodt
53W–73L career · no lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.12
Jill Grams
32W–33L career · 1 line in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.06
3.5
Cynthia Weick
38W–37L career · no lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.98
Johanna Steigerwald
29W–46L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.