Teams

Rice

2026 Mixed 40 & Over - NAZ · NAZ 3.5 mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-22vs KolodyLost 03
L#1 DoublesRon Gray / Jennifer Recknor vs Michael Turner / Janice Greene4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSteven Danner / Joanne Hopmeyer vs Packy Baker / Kirsten Gunn2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJesse Silver / Lori Pappas vs John Kolody / Caroline Austin-Mathur1-6, 3-6
2026-08-22vs KolodyLost 02
L#1 DoublesRon Gray / Dana Jacko vs Michael Turner / Janice Greene4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBob Boyer / Jennifer Recknor vs John Kolody / Kirsten Gunn0-6, 1-6
2026-07-11vs KolodyLost 02
L#1 DoublesBob Boyer / Dana Jacko vs Jennifer Bearchell / Michael Chan2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSteven Danner / Joanne Hopmeyer vs Packy Baker / Julie Crow1-6, 1-6
2026-07-11vs KolodySplit 11
L#1 DoublesTodd Gillenwater / Vicki Penna vs Robert Schuessler / Kathy Cox3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSteven Danner / Jean Brown vs Eric Nielsen / Janice Greene6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · NAZ 3.5 mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NAZ/Cohen/40&over/3.5mixed7118615182
2Kolody3310818145
3Rice0621632210

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Steven Danner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Bob Boyer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.09
Dana Jacko
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.84
Jennifer Recknor
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.81
Joanne Hopmeyer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Vicki Penna
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Lori Pappas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Michelle Pappas
published
Jean Brown
published
Jesse Silver
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Todd Gillenwater
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steven Danner + Joanne Hopmeyer21139% games−3.3% vs expected
Vicki Penna + Todd Gillenwater224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Steven Danner
19W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Bob Boyer
7W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Dana Jacko
52W–61L career · 2 lines in 2026
23%76%<1%
3.09
Jennifer Recknor
17W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
2.84
Joanne Hopmeyer
27W–57L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
2.81
Vicki Penna
40W–50L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
Lori Pappas
31W–32L career · 1 line in 2026
5%94%1%
2.71
Michelle Pappas
29W–27L career · no lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
Jean Brown
22W–15L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jesse Silver
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Todd Gillenwater
4W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.