Teams

WNCS Lachance (HRC)

NC Singles League 55 & Over WNC 2026 · 55+ Singles Women 3.5 - Tues PM

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-04vs WNCB Bowie (HRC)Won 30
W#1 SinglesMARY PADGETT vs Michal Baird6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesMarie Cowan vs Susan Baum6-3, 6-0
W#3 SinglesMaki Goskowicz vs Kristy Owens6-4, 6-2
2026-07-28vs WNCB Bowie (HRC)Won 20
W#1 SinglesJennifer Hudgens vs Karen Watson6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMARY PADGETT vs Jennifer Profili6-3, 6-4
2026-07-21vs WNCB Bowie (HRC)Won 20
W#1 SinglesJennifer Hudgens vs Kristy Owens6-0, 6-2
W#3 SinglesMarie Cowan vs Sheri Sparks6-1, 6-1
2026-07-14vs WNCB Bowie (HRC)Won 20
W#1 SinglesMARY PADGETT vs Brenda Bowie6-3, 6-0
W#3 SinglesJennifer Hudgens vs Jennifer Profili6-0, 6-1
2026-06-30vs WNCB Bowie (HRC)Won 30
W#1 SinglesSallie LaChance vs Jodi Grabowski6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMaki Goskowicz vs Susan Baum6-4, 6-2
W#3 SinglesMARY PADGETT vs Michal Baird7-5, 6-0
2026-06-23vs WNCB Bowie (HRC)Won 20
W#1 SinglesMaki Goskowicz vs Brenda Bowie6-3, 6-0
W#2 SinglesSallie LaChance vs Jennifer Profili6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 55+ Singles Women 3.5 - Tues PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WNCS Lachance (HRC)60171270
2WNCB Bowie (HRC)0611734205

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Sallie LaChance
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.54
Jennifer Hudgens
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.38
Maki Goskowicz
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
MARY PADGETT
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
3.22
Marie Cowan
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Sallie LaChance
137W–131L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.57
Jennifer Hudgens
23W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.54
3.5
Maki Goskowicz
72W–34L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
MARY PADGETT
14W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
Marie Cowan
19W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.