Teams

WNCB Bowie (HRC)

NC Singles League 55 & Over WNC 2026 · 55+ Singles Women 3.5 - Tues PM

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-04vs WNCS Lachance (HRC)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesMichal Baird vs MARY PADGETT1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesSusan Baum vs Marie Cowan3-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesKristy Owens vs Maki Goskowicz4-6, 2-6
2026-07-28vs WNCS Lachance (HRC)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesKaren Watson vs Jennifer Hudgens2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesJennifer Profili vs MARY PADGETT3-6, 4-6
2026-07-21vs WNCS Lachance (HRC)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesKristy Owens vs Jennifer Hudgens0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesBrenda Bowie vs Lisa Young2-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesSheri Sparks vs Marie Cowan1-6, 1-6
2026-07-14vs WNCS Lachance (HRC)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesBrenda Bowie vs MARY PADGETT3-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesKristy Owens vs Lisa Young2-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesJennifer Profili vs Jennifer Hudgens0-6, 1-6
2026-06-30vs WNCS Lachance (HRC)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesJodi Grabowski vs Sallie LaChance0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesSusan Baum vs Maki Goskowicz4-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesMichal Baird vs MARY PADGETT5-7, 0-6
2026-06-23vs WNCS Lachance (HRC)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesBrenda Bowie vs Maki Goskowicz3-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesJennifer Profili vs Sallie LaChance0-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesKristy Owens vs Lisa Young4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 55+ Singles Women 3.5 - Tues PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WNCS Lachance (HRC)60171270
2WNCB Bowie (HRC)0611734205

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Kristy Owens
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.15
Jennifer Profili
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.11
Brenda Bowie
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Susan Baum
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.96
Michal Baird
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
2.95
Jodi Grabowski
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.90
Karen Watson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.89
Sheri Sparks
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sheri Sparks + Michal Baird123 matchesnot enough data
Susan Baum + Jodi Grabowski213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristy Owens
16W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Jennifer Profili
7W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Brenda Bowie
9W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
Susan Baum
6W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.00
Michal Baird
21W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
Jodi Grabowski
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.95
Karen Watson
18W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%76%23%
2.90
Sheri Sparks
13W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.