Teams

TOC.Wilson

2026 CTRL Combo Doubles 55 & Over · Combo 55 & Over 6.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.19 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-25vs PW.StylskiLost 12
W#1 DoublesKathryn Jezior / Angki Sager vs Lisa Allen / Angela Newman7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJill Cardella / Anne Farmer vs Pam Foland / Margo Stutesman1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesWendy Pannell / Cheryl Morgenstein vs Rosalind Manning / Karen Coe2-6, 1-6
2026-08-18vs LOCH.HoylesWon 21
L#1 DoublesKathryn Jezior / Nelda VanAarde vs Priti Ghatlia / DeLana Anderson1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDenise Wilson / Angki Sager vs Ana Maria Fernandez Serrat / Patricia Gaudino6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesHolly Haney / Wendy Pannell vs Monica Palmer / Susan Hoffman6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2026-08-11vs TOC.HollettWon 21
W#1 DoublesJill Cardella / Kathryn Jezior vs Shelly Jude / Hope Graney6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesHolly Haney / Anne Farmer vs Audrey Hollett / Araya Coffey4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDenise Wilson / Dawn Losito vs Kari Moncrief / Jennifer Wolborsky7-5, 6-1
2026-08-04vs TOC.CampbellWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnne Farmer / Nelda VanAarde vs Liz Railton / Amy Demsko6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesDenise Wilson / Angki Sager vs Rhonda Kaspar / Nancy Myer6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCristina Davis / Kim Tobey vs Janet Constantino / Nicole Gagnon4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 55 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cristina Davis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Kathryn Jezior
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Wendy Pannell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Holly Haney
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.01
Kim Tobey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.97
Anne Farmer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.96
Nelda VanAarde
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Jill Cardella
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.75
Cheryl Morgenstein
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Angki Sager
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Dawn Losito
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dawn Losito + Angki Sager51339% games+1.3% vs expected
Angki Sager + Kathryn Jezior121348% games−3.4% vs expected
Kathryn Jezior + Wendy Pannell4647% games−3.5% vs expected
Nelda VanAarde + Angki Sager82043% games−6.8% vs expected
Nelda VanAarde + Kathryn Jezior6455% gamesnot enough data
Holly Haney + Angki Sager1435% gamesnot enough data
Dawn Losito + Kathryn Jezior224 matchesnot enough data
Holly Haney + Nelda VanAarde213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cristina Davis
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Kathryn Jezior
72W–94L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Wendy Pannell
8W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.05
Holly Haney
12W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Kim Tobey
75W–76L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.01
3.5
Anne Farmer
5W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.97
3
Nelda VanAarde
80W–116L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
Jill Cardella
12W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Cheryl Morgenstein
9W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Angki Sager
108W–162L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Dawn Losito
70W–103L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.