Teams

PW.Stylski

2026 CTRL Combo Doubles 55 & Over · Combo 55 & Over 6.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.32 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-25vs TOC.WilsonWon 21
L#1 DoublesLisa Allen / Angela Newman vs Kathryn Jezior / Angki Sager6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesPam Foland / Margo Stutesman vs Jill Cardella / Anne Farmer6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRosalind Manning / Karen Coe vs Wendy Pannell / Cheryl Morgenstein6-2, 6-1
2026-08-18vs TOC.HollettWon 21
W#1 DoublesRosalind Manning / Harriet Wilson vs Patty Parrnelli / Wendy Sielaty6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCarole Bobby / Pam Foland vs Kari Moncrief / Regina Davis6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBrenda MacLean / Lisa Allen vs Sharon Fadelici / Julie Liddle0-6, 4-6
2026-08-11vs KF.LeeLost 03
L#1 DoublesRuthann Gray / Pam Foland vs Mary Parker / Beth Johnson6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCarole Bobby / Harriet Wilson vs Virginia Lewis / Donna Lee0-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMargo Stutesman / Renee Getz vs Debbie Powell / Susan Birchfield5-7, 0-6
2026-08-04vs LOCH.HoylesLost 12
L#1 DoublesLysa Stylski / Karen Coe vs Ana Maria Fernandez Serrat / DeLana Anderson6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBrenda MacLean / Pam Foland vs Rosanne Facktor / Debra Combos6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCarole Bobby / Harriet Wilson vs Lisa Sockett / Monica Palmer7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · Combo 55 & Over 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LOCH.Hoyles2163990
2TOC.Shukla1021222
3PW.Hulbert1254966
4PW.West12451180
5PW.Stylski12361281
6TOC.Butler02061271
7TOC.Campbell031817110

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Carole Bobby
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.41
Rosalind Manning
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Ruthann Gray
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Margo Stutesman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Lysa Stylski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Angela Newman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Micha Federico
published 3
3.07
June Plotkin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.04
Pam Foland
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.02
Harriet Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.99
Brenda MacLean
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.97
Karen Coe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.69
Renee Getz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Elise Steagall
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lysa Stylski + Harriet Wilson6356% games+5.2% vs expected
Carole Bobby + Rosalind Manning91253% games−6.3% vs expected
Rosalind Manning + Lysa Stylski8550% games−6.6% vs expected
June Plotkin + Margo Stutesman5452% gamesnot enough data
Harriet Wilson + Margo Stutesman2735% gamesnot enough data
Carole Bobby + Renee Getz0719% gamesnot enough data
June Plotkin + Renee Getz0625% gamesnot enough data
June Plotkin + Harriet Wilson2346% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carole Bobby
186W–190L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.58
3.5
Rosalind Manning
97W–78L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
Ruthann Gray
9W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Margo Stutesman
137W–161L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Lysa Stylski
105W–110L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Angela Newman
10W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
3
Micha Federico
106W–82L career · no lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.12
3.5
June Plotkin
81W–100L career · 2 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.07
Pam Foland
2W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Harriet Wilson
66W–119L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
3.5
Brenda MacLean
1W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.99
3
Karen Coe
54W–91L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Renee Getz
29W–99L career · 1 line in 2026
8%90%1%
2.69
Elise Steagall
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.