Teams

BRMST YELLOW

2024 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-08-08vs NJ PURPLELost 01
L#1 DoublesNoelle Anthony / Sue Vanderberg vs Crystal Campbell Messer / Terri Kimura7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2024-08-01vs LTA-Q GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJeanne Peoples / Stacy May vs Hilary Hartwig / Catherine Romero4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSue Vanderberg vs Olimpia Mejia7-6, 6-2
2024-07-25vs BRMST NAVYLost 01
L#2 DoublesJeanne Peoples / Sue Vanderberg vs Katherine Lazenby / Stacey Mari1-6, 2-6
2024-07-18vs MEA GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesJill Long / Sue Vanderberg vs Karina Hauser / Monika King4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJeanne Peoples vs Lucy Kuchta0-6, 3-6
2024-06-27vs LAC GREENLost 02
L#1 SinglesSue Vanderberg vs Liana Kelly3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJeanne Peoples / Kim Graves vs Mona Jones / Lindsey Cheney7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Noelle Anthony
published
3.64
Stacy May
published
3.64
Jeanne Peoples
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.62
Kim Graves
published
3.54
Jill Long
published
3.51
Kathy Schmidt
published
3.50
Kelly Lenz
published
3.49
Sue Vanderberg
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeanne Peoples + Sue Vanderberg2743% games−10.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Noelle Anthony
20W–13L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.75
Stacy May
10W–16L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.64
4
Jeanne Peoples
111W–109L career · 4 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.64
Kim Graves
11W–16L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.62
Jill Long
5W–9L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.54
Kathy Schmidt
8W–27L career · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.51
Kelly Lenz
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
3.50
4
Sue Vanderberg
57W–90L career · 5 lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
3.49

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.