Teams

LAC GREEN

2024 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-01vs NJ PURPLESplit 11
W#1 DoublesPaula Nelsen / Liana Kelly vs Debbie Welsh / Mandy Coughlin6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesGretchen Blair vs Crystal Campbell Messer3-6, 4-6
2024-07-25vs LTA-Q GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesPaula Nelsen / Kelly Mcreynolds vs Dennette Stroh / Maureen Hartigan6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesGretchen Blair vs Hilary Hartwig6-3, 6-0
2024-07-18vs BRMST NAVYWon 10
W#2 DoublesJoyce Kelly / Gretchen Blair vs Samantha Sutphin / Trudy Brancucci6-2, 6-2
2024-07-17vs NJ REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesLydia Wuensch / Paula Nelsen vs Caryn Moller / Heidi Warriner4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-07-11vs MEA GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesChristine Payne / Kelly Mcreynolds vs Tanya Goble / Karina Hauser4-4
L#2 DoublesLydia Wuensch / Paula Nelsen vs Monika King / Sharon Day2-5
2024-06-27vs BRMST YELLOWWon 10
W#1 DoublesGretchen Blair / Kelly Mcreynolds vs Kelly Lenz / Jill Long6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Gretchen Blair
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.87
Kelly Mcreynolds
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Liana Kelly
published
3.71
Mona Jones
published
3.70
Joyce Kelly
published
3.68
Paula Nelsen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.63
Lydia Wuensch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.47
Lindsey Cheney
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paula Nelsen + Lydia Wuensch4448% games−2.2% vs expected
Paula Nelsen + Kelly Mcreynolds7362% games−5.1% vs expected
Kelly Mcreynolds + Lydia Wuensch8953% games−9.0% vs expected
Joyce Kelly + Liana Kelly134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gretchen Blair
37W–30L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
4.00
4
Kelly Mcreynolds
127W–50L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.87
Liana Kelly
12W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.83
Mona Jones
20W–24L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
Joyce Kelly
26W–36L career · no lines in 2024
<1%7%93%
3.70
4
Paula Nelsen
85W–49L career · 4 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Lydia Wuensch
65W–52L career · 2 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.63
Lindsey Cheney
18W–15L career · no lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
3.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.