Teams

Caves 3.5

2026 Mixed 18&Over-PB · 3.5 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.43 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-07-26vs Meridian CTALost 02
L#1 DoublesChris Caves / Samantha Jones vs Matt Schanrock / Andrea Skelton5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGregg McBride / Melissa McDaniel vs Chance Davidson / Nicola Fruge3-6, 1-6
2026-07-26vs Meridian CTAWon 20
W#1 DoublesWill Stevens / Melissa McDaniel vs Joey Williams / Semmes Ford6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesChris Caves / Samantha Jones vs Nicola Fruge / Chance Davidson6-2, 6-4
2026-06-28vs Meridian CTAWon 20
W#1 DoublesChris Caves / Elizabeth Schwartz vs Michael van Veckhoven / Nicola Fruge6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCharles Hanson / Mary Jo Goodin vs Joey Williams / Semmes Ford6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Mary Jo Goodin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Emily Rapoza
published 3.5
3.38
Samantha Jones
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.34
Christopher Harper
published 3.5
3.34
Chris Caves
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Elizabeth Schwartz
published 3.5
Gregg McBride
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Alen Hajnal
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.91
Charles Hanson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.87
Will Stevens
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Caves + Samantha Jones1444% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Jo Goodin
20W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.54
3.5
Emily Rapoza
32W–21L career · no lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
Samantha Jones
20W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Christopher Harper
7W–20L career · no lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Chris Caves
19W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Elizabeth Schwartz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Gregg McBride
3W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
Alen Hajnal
72W–31L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.18
3.5
Charles Hanson
32W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
76%24%<1%
2.91
Will Stevens
17W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.