Teams

UPTA18TL/Cooper/Hwy14

2026 UPTA Tri-Level 18 & Over · 18+ TL Women - 3.0, 3.5, 4.0

20 players · average NTRP 3.46 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-10vs UPTA18TL/Franz/ButlerSpringsWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristina Rogers / Tiffany Hochet vs Holly Tant / Lynne Todd7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAmanda Powell / Katie Saad vs Julie Branham / Alyssa Monday3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAmanda King / Catie Kelley vs Emily Strickland / Stefani Wallen-Smith6-3, 6-1
2026-06-19vs UPTA (A) 4.0W 18 & Over (O'Shea)Won 21
W#1 DoublesChristina Rogers / Kathryn Rountree vs Katherine Hinshelwood / Harriet Gray7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMona Cooper / Katie Saad vs Tracy O'Shea / Drake Gribbin6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesClaudia Kornaros / Lora Henderson vs Catherine Webb / Kate Carlson4-6, 4-6
2026-06-12vs UPTA18TL/Brading/HollyTreeWon 21
L#1 DoublesMona Cooper / Hope Moriarty vs Elizabeth Bowman / Carol Rabel1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAmanda Powell / Katie Saad vs Corinne Nickell / Jennifer Aughtry6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesGina Pelino / Brooke Jones vs Lara Knight / Blair Brading7-5, 6-1
2026-06-05vs UPTA18TL/Herford/Neely FarmWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristina Burnette / Celeste Blinston vs Diana Otero-Santacana / Holly Smith7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDanielle Henderson / Katie Saad vs Patricia Surles / Jordan Wise6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCatie Kelley / Amanda King vs Dorelly Herford / Joanne Cruickshank6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18+ TL Women - 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Christina Rogers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Celeste Blinston
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Kathryn Rountree
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.68
Christina Burnette
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Elizabeth Malcolm
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.58
Leslie Waltz
published
3.40
Amanda Powell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Danielle Henderson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Jacque Foster
published 3.5
3.30
Hope Moriarty
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Mona Cooper
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Jamie Miller
published 3.5
3.22
Katie Saad
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Catie Kelley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.99
Claudia Kornaros
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.86
Lora Henderson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.79
Gina Pelino
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.70
Shelly James
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Elizabeth Faulkner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Tiffany Hochet
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shelly James + Gina Pelino5647% games+4.4% vs expected
Shelly James + Claudia Kornaros8753% games+1.8% vs expected
Claudia Kornaros + Lora Henderson121151% games+0.7% vs expected
Leslie Waltz + Kathryn Rountree7453% games−2.3% vs expected
Celeste Blinston + Kathryn Rountree3255% games−2.5% vs expected
Mona Cooper + Danielle Henderson3644% games−5.4% vs expected
Hope Moriarty + Christina Rogers314 matchesnot enough data
Katie Saad + Danielle Henderson224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christina Rogers
28W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Celeste Blinston
39W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
Kathryn Rountree
44W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Christina Burnette
38W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
8%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Elizabeth Malcolm
57W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.66
Leslie Waltz
57W–31L career · no lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.58
3.5
Amanda Powell
22W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Danielle Henderson
31W–28L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
Jacque Foster
31W–23L career · no lines in 2026
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Hope Moriarty
29W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
Mona Cooper
34W–45L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Jamie Miller
9W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Katie Saad
20W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.22
3
Catie Kelley
26W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.08
3
Claudia Kornaros
58W–53L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
2.99
Lora Henderson
60W–53L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Gina Pelino
38W–52L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.79
Shelly James
29W–53L career · 1 line in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Elizabeth Faulkner
15W–30L career · 1 line in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
Tiffany Hochet
8W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.