Teams

QRRC-Heinz

2024 OH OV WINTER 18&O Mixed · Winter 18&O 9.0MXD

10 players · average NTRP 4.33 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-04-19Split 11
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Schaefer / Reid Wynkoop vs Anne Lutz / Jonathan Scherquist6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDonna McClanahan / Darrin Heinz vs Jason Merkle / Courtney Taylor7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2024-03-16vs KTC-MerkleLost 02
L#1 DoublesDonna McClanahan / Darrin Heinz vs Arian McNeil / Donovan Christman5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRichard Heilman / Elizabeth Schaefer vs John Pinard / Courtney Taylor6-7, 1-6
2024-02-23vs KTC-MerkleLost 03
L#1 DoublesDarrin Heinz / Donna McClanahan vs Aaron Wolters / Lauren Hawley6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Hann / Richard Heilman vs Alexander Boardman / Katie Boeckman2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEnrico Ferri / JACLYN STUBBS vs Andrew Linden / Nicole Merkle2-6, 3-6
2024-02-09vs KTC-MerkleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesReid Wynkoop / Elizabeth Schaefer vs John Pinard / Courtney Taylor6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesEnrico Ferri / JACLYN STUBBS vs Katie Boeckman / Jonathan Scherquist1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Winter 18&O 9.0MXD
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KTC-Merkle3193885
2QRRC-Heinz133918131

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Darrin Heinz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.42
Reid Wynkoop
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Elizabeth Schaefer
published 4.5
4.24
Kelly Fackel
published
4.10
Enrico Ferri
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.03
Elizabeth Hann
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.73
Jorge Crespo
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.72
JACLYN STUBBS
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
Donna McClanahan
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
Richard Heilman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Darrin Heinz + Donna McClanahan5551% games+8.8% vs expected
Kelly Fackel + Richard Heilman5353% games−3.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Darrin Heinz
77W–36L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
4.43
Reid Wynkoop
62W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
4.42
4.5
Elizabeth Schaefer
23W–13L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kelly Fackel
100W–20L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Enrico Ferri
143W–91L career · 2 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
4.10
4.5
Elizabeth Hann
119W–102L career · 4 lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
4.03
Jorge Crespo
53W–92L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
4
JACLYN STUBBS
90W–75L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Donna McClanahan
234W–146L career · 5 lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.56
Richard Heilman
58W–80L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.