Teams

C 7.5W PW DeWerth

2024 NEOTA Combo · NEOTA 7.5 Combo Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.71 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-11-24vs C 7.5W CC HorganLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Bucheit / Ann Maloney vs Kelly Capes / Natalie Marotta0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnn Dewerth / Katherine Reid vs Sharon Horgan / Suzanne Sbrocco5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Scott / Allison Austin vs Jenn Gates / Carla Greenwood2-6, 0-6
2024-11-08vs C 7.5W AO KoziaraWon 21
W#1 DoublesKate Began / Allison Austin vs Alison Boeckman / Sara Verespej3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Boswell / Celia Reid vs Jennifer Atkinson / Andrea Cafarelli7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAllison Clarkl / Erin Carpenter vs Erica Chiricosta / Amanda Vecchio3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-11-03vs C 7.5W NR BartramLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnjela Hindman / Allison Welch vs Margaret VanDine / Irene Slattery7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Bucheit / Sarah Boswell vs Marla Schmidt / Susie Todaro6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAllison Clarkl / Therese McDonnell vs Allison Evans / Karen Kneiss0-6, 4-6
2024-10-25vs C 7.5W WR2 RobertsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAllison Clarkl / Katherine Reid vs Beth Jokhio / Kathleen Daberko3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Koehler / Celia Reid vs Delores Schwan / Olga Khrenova6-4, 6-0
2024-10-20vs C 7.5W CC HorganWon 21
W#1 DoublesAllison Welch / Anjela Hindman vs Kelly Capes / Marnie Walcutt6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKatherine Reid / Kate Began vs Kathleen Weiss / Deborah Rachek6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCelia Reid / Laura Anderson vs Stacey Varuolo / Carla Greenwood1-6, 3-6
2024-10-05vs C 7.5W AO KoziaraLost 02
L#1 DoublesNancy Koehler / Lisa Ott vs Debora Ksenich / Jennifer Castelluccio3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAnn Dewerth / Ann Maloney vs Kit Quigley / Meredith Stephens6-7, 1-6
2024-09-29vs C 7.5W NR BartramLost 12
L#1 DoublesAllison Austin / Jennifer Bucheit vs Allison Evans / Lisa Gallagher3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAllison Welch / Lisa Fallon vs Karen Kneiss / Annette Lipaj6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesNancy Koehler / Ann Maloney vs Kelley Korte / Susie Todaro2-6, 0-6
2024-09-21vs C 7.5W WR2 RobertsWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Bucheit / Sarah Boswell vs Kelle DeBoth / Helen Scanlon6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesAnn Dewerth / Therese McDonnell vs Kelli Kern / Kiyomi Fukamachi5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKatherine Reid / Susan Scott vs Jo Ann FInk / Christine Bucknell4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-10-15vs C 7.5W MV2 O'ShaughnessyLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Bucheit / Erin Carpenter vs Carol Leslie / Christa Galehouse1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Koehler / Katherine Reid vs Tasha Mixon / Kristin Chuko4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAnn Dewerth / Diana Lindblom vs Karen Cipriani / Janet Ellen Elder3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · NEOTA 7.5 Combo Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1C 7.5W AO Koziara7121310155
2C 7.5W SP Grauel7116822199
3C 7.5W KI Lightner6218619179
4C 7.5W NC Gamby5316821193
5C 7.5W GR Johnson53141026228
6C 7.5W NR Bartram53121231231
7C 7.5W CC Horgan44121224211
8C 7.5W MV1 Kirchick44141024208
9C 7.5W WR1 Gossett44121231218
10C 7.5W AVB Kerosky3591533221
11C 7.5W PW DeWerth3591534244
12C 7.5W MV2 O'Shaughnessy3571737250
13C 7.5W TP Fox2671737267
14C 7.5W LT Ruggles1771736245
15C 7.5W WR2 Roberts1761840260

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Allison Welch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.50
Kate Began
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.31
Jennifer Bucheit
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.30
Sarah Boswell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Celia Reid
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.23
Allison Austin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Allison Clarkl
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.12
Nancy Koehler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.01
Ann Dewerth
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.96
Anjela Hindman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.95
Ann Maloney
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.81
Katherine Reid
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.58
Lisa Fallon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Erin Carpenter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Lisa Ott
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Therese McDonnell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Welch + Kate Began7161% games+5.1% vs expected
Jennifer Bucheit + Sarah Boswell7252% games+0.2% vs expected
Sarah Boswell + Ann Dewerth4253% games−0.1% vs expected
Nancy Koehler + Katherine Reid71150% games−0.6% vs expected
Katherine Reid + Ann Dewerth192945% games−2.7% vs expected
Nancy Koehler + Lisa Ott2937% games−3.1% vs expected
Lisa Fallon + Anjela Hindman4254% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Koehler + Sarah Boswell1445% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Allison Welch
54W–36L career · 8 lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
4.06
Kate Began
58W–38L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.50
Jennifer Bucheit
24W–41L career · 5 lines in 2024
92%8%<1%
3.31
Sarah Boswell
63W–47L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Celia Reid
54W–36L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Allison Austin
67W–52L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
4
Allison Clarkl
8W–15L career · 3 lines in 2024
99%1%<1%
3.19
Nancy Koehler
56W–71L career · 6 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Ann Dewerth
58W–69L career · 5 lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.01
3.5
Anjela Hindman
64W–42L career · 4 lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
2.96
3.5
Ann Maloney
38W–59L career · 6 lines in 2024
65%35%<1%
2.95
Katherine Reid
116W–138L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
Lisa Fallon
60W–41L career · 3 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
2.58
Erin Carpenter
19W–28L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lisa Ott
16W–75L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Therese McDonnell
10W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.