Teams

C 7.5W MV2 O'Shaughnessy

2024 NEOTA Combo · NEOTA 7.5 Combo Women

22 players · average NTRP 3.65 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-11-23vs C 7.5W AVB KeroskyLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarole Sanderson / Susan Vinborg vs Joanne Gardner / Lori Digiacomo1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDeborah O'Shaughnessy / Kristin Chuko vs Camilla Hill / Pamela Hudson3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-11-10vs C 7.5W MV1 KirchickLost 03
L#1 DoublesJaneen Miklowski / Yulia Lyublinski vs Kathleen Aranavage / Erica Richardson6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKaren Cipriani / Patricia Mercuri vs Megan Shiga / Holly Yotter6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Lenahan / Donna Rondini vs Allayne Stephans / Lisa Sackett3-6, 4-6
2024-11-02vs C 7.5W WR1 GossettLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Vinborg / Cathleen Stover vs Allison Sency / Arminda Parker2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesYulia Lyublinski / Patricia Mercuri vs Courtney Foster / Lori Goosmann6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMissy Sherwin / Deborah O'Shaughnessy vs Liz Clark / Sally Iuston6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2024-10-27vs C 7.5W KI LightnerWon 21
W#1 DoublesJaneen Miklowski / Yulia Lyublinski vs Elyse Lightner / Claire Galiette5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChipo Jolibois / Donna Rondini vs Erica Wigton / Kathryn Duvall6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCarol Leslie / Janice Schmitt vs Susan Kim / Kelsey Ruddock6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2024-10-20vs C 7.5W AVB KeroskyWon 21
L#1 DoublesCarole Sanderson / Alesia Jones vs Lori Digiacomo / Jane Moose2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJaneen Miklowski / Janet Stonehill vs Dina Hopps / Carla Elenz6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDeborah O'Shaughnessy / Donna Rondini vs Joan Kerosky / Susan Aey6-2, 6-2
2024-10-06vs C 7.5W MV1 KirchickLost 03
L#1 DoublesDonna Rondini / Kristin Chuko vs Amy Zucca / Kate Bishop4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Leslie / Susan Lenahan vs Allayne Stephans / Eileen Connell7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDeanne Gibson / Karen Cipriani vs Michelle Miluk / Liza Brady2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-09-29vs C 7.5W WR1 GossettWon 21
W#1 DoublesDeanne Gibson / Cathleen Stover vs Courtney Foster / Brittney Kohanski6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarole Sanderson / Susan Vinborg vs Arminda Parker / Caterina Petty7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJaneen Miklowski / Missy Sherwin vs Liz Clark / Sally Iuston2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-09-20vs C 7.5W KI LightnerLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarol Leslie / Patricia Mercuri vs Komila Mirolimova / Kelsey Ruddock2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesChipo Jolibois / Marian Lauer vs Elizabeth Hill / Kathryn Duvall6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesElyse Gustafson / Karen Cipriani vs Erica Wigton / Katharine Knowlton0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · NEOTA 7.5 Combo Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1C 7.5W AO Koziara7121310155
2C 7.5W SP Grauel7116822199
3C 7.5W KI Lightner6218619179
4C 7.5W NC Gamby5316821193
5C 7.5W GR Johnson53141026228
6C 7.5W NR Bartram53121231231
7C 7.5W CC Horgan44121224211
8C 7.5W MV1 Kirchick44141024208
9C 7.5W WR1 Gossett44121231218
10C 7.5W AVB Kerosky3591533221
11C 7.5W PW DeWerth3591534244
12C 7.5W MV2 O'Shaughnessy3571737250
13C 7.5W TP Fox2671737267
14C 7.5W LT Ruggles1771736245
15C 7.5W WR2 Roberts1761840260

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Carol Leslie
published 4
3.68
Janeen Miklowski
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.67
Donna Rondini
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Alesia Jones
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Deanne Gibson
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.54
Kristin Chuko
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.51
Karen Cipriani
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.49
Yulia Lyublinski
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.43
Chipo Jolibois
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Marian Lauer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Susan Vinborg
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Deborah O'Shaughnessy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
Janet Stonehill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Patricia Mercuri
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.25
Carole Sanderson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Cathleen Stover
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Janice Schmitt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Elyse Gustafson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.67
Audrey Heckaman
published 3
Kristen Davet
published
Missy Sherwin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Lenahan
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cathleen Stover + Janet Stonehill8165% games+14.0% vs expected
Karen Cipriani + Cathleen Stover7263% games+11.8% vs expected
Deborah O'Shaughnessy + Janet Stonehill12362% games+10.4% vs expected
Janet Stonehill + Carole Sanderson6160% games+7.3% vs expected
Kristen Davet + Cathleen Stover23465% games+7.1% vs expected
Deborah O'Shaughnessy + Cathleen Stover11756% games+4.8% vs expected
Elyse Gustafson + Kristin Chuko12855% games+3.8% vs expected
Cathleen Stover + Carole Sanderson11461% games+2.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carol Leslie
47W–20L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Janeen Miklowski
77W–90L career · 4 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Donna Rondini
94W–78L career · 6 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Alesia Jones
58W–44L career · 1 line in 2024
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Deanne Gibson
102W–61L career · 5 lines in 2024
10%89%<1%
3.67
Kristin Chuko
215W–144L career · 3 lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.54
Karen Cipriani
86W–70L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%46%54%
3.51
Yulia Lyublinski
131W–80L career · 3 lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
3.49
3.5
Chipo Jolibois
85W–57L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
Marian Lauer
41W–28L career · 1 line in 2024
77%23%<1%
3.40
Susan Vinborg
43W–66L career · 3 lines in 2024
90%10%<1%
3.33
3.5
Deborah O'Shaughnessy
109W–70L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.32
Janet Stonehill
89W–28L career · 1 line in 2024
1%91%8%
3.32
Patricia Mercuri
171W–118L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Carole Sanderson
152W–106L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Cathleen Stover
85W–33L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
Janice Schmitt
57W–76L career · 3 lines in 2024
62%38%<1%
2.96
3.5
Elyse Gustafson
103W–128L career · 1 line in 2024
70%30%<1%
2.93
3
Audrey Heckaman
73W–69L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.67
Kristen Davet
37W–20L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Missy Sherwin
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Lenahan
45W–42L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.