Teams

FTA18S/Brookstone/Finch

FTA SINGLES 18 & OVER - FTA Saturday · 3.0 Women Saturday

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-18vs FTA18S/Riverside/PompeyWon 30
W#1 SinglesMelodee Rosopa vs Christina Pompey6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesPaige Botts vs Xiaoqing Yang7-6, 6-4
W#3 SinglesLeah Winton vs Cristina Torres6-4, 6-2
2025-10-04vs FTA18S/NeelyFarm/WiseWon 21
W#1 SinglesMelodee Rosopa vs Brooke Jones6-4, 6-2
L#2 SinglesHolly Humphries vs Leigh Wolke0-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesNicole Finch vs Brie Soler6-2, 6-4
2025-09-20vs FTA18S/Cardinal/WhiteWon 21
W#1 SinglesNicole Finch vs Tegan Abson6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMelodee Rosopa vs Claire Maybin6-4, 6-1
L#3 SinglesMadison Botts vs Sally Cao0-6, 2-6
2025-09-13vs FTA18S/HollyTree/BradingWon 30
W#1 SinglesJenna Spencer vs Tabitha Taylor6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesPaige Botts vs Alicia Walters7-5, 6-4
W#3 SinglesMadison Botts vs Arden Foster6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2025-09-06vs FTA18A/Riverside/SheehanWon 30
W#1 SinglesPaige Botts vs Emily Busold6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesHolly Humphries vs Emily Proctor6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesDanielle Fomin vs Meg Mcgee6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Jenna Spencer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.00
Nicole Finch
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
2.97
Leah Winton
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.96
Holly Humphries
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.89
Kristi King-Brock
published
2.80
Melodee Rosopa
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Danielle Fomin
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.73
Paige Botts
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.56
Madison Botts
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristi King-Brock + Leah Winton12558% games+10.1% vs expected
Paige Botts + Madison Botts314 matchesnot enough data
Kristi King-Brock + Nicole Finch303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jenna Spencer
33W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.06
Nicole Finch
44W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.00
Leah Winton
39W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
Holly Humphries
20W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.96
Kristi King-Brock
54W–29L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.89
Melodee Rosopa
20W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%2%98%
2.80
3
Danielle Fomin
3W–3L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Paige Botts
49W–33L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%5%95%
2.73
Madison Botts
15W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%32%68%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.