Teams

FTA18S/NeelyFarm/Wise

FTA SINGLES 18 & OVER - FTA Saturday · 3.0 Women Saturday

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-18vs FTA18S/Cardinal/WhiteWon 21
W#1 SinglesLeigh Wolke vs Kellar Rogers7-5, 7-5
L#2 SinglesJordan Wise vs Sally Cao5-7, 3-6
W#3 SinglesBrie Soler vs Paola White6-0, 6-3
2025-10-04vs FTA18S/Brookstone/FinchSplit 11
W#2 SinglesLeigh Wolke vs Holly Humphries6-0, 6-0
L#3 SinglesBrie Soler vs Nicole Finch2-6, 4-6
2025-09-21vs FTA18S/HollyTree/BradingLost 12
W#1 SinglesJordan Wise vs Alicia Walters6-4, 6-4
L#2 SinglesTeresa Fox vs Blair Brading2-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesMary Beth Campbell vs Tabitha Taylor7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2025-09-13vs FTA18A/Riverside/SheehanWon 30
W#1 SinglesJordan Wise vs Meg Mcgee6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesSydney Fowler vs Emily Busold6-4, 6-0
W#3 SinglesTeresa Fox vs Emily Proctor6-0, 6-2
2025-09-06vs FTA18S/Riverside/PompeyWon 20
W#1 SinglesLeigh Wolke vs Xiaoqing Yang6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesBrie Soler vs Kim Dailey6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Leigh Wolke
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.00
Brie Soler
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.88
Jordan Wise
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.83
Teresa Fox
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Mary Beth Campbell
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Sydney Fowler
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jordan Wise + Brie Soler213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leigh Wolke
40W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.37
3
Brie Soler
31W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
Jordan Wise
23W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
Teresa Fox
6W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
Mary Beth Campbell
6W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sydney Fowler
1W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.