Teams

LEBTC RED

2024 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO

9 players · average NTRP 3.07 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-05-06vs NJ REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesCatherine Zeberlein / Stacie Sonius vs Norma Crockett / Briah Carey6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEmily Dreyer / Kara Edmiston Lavaux vs Laura Yonamine / Kristina Klug5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2024-04-30vs NJ GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesChristine Gish / Alison Cargo vs Mollie Toth / Maggie Carson5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCatherine Zeberlein / Kellie Naclerio vs Sarah Weill / Denise Champion2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-04-13vs KC-CC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesEmily Dreyer / Catherine Zeberlein vs Kaitlin Vellore / Heather Miner4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAlison Cargo vs Lori Galyk1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKara Edmiston Lavaux / Christine Gish vs Jenna Masiello / Christine Angelini5-7, 6-0, 1-0
2024-04-06vs PH GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesStacie Sonius / Kellie Naclerio vs Margo Livadariu / Brooke Fox4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKara Edmiston Lavaux / Nancy Scoville vs Amy Attwood / Sarah Wadsworth3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-03-30vs LEBTC BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesStacie Sonius / Kellie Naclerio vs Jessica Field / Amee Auberry7-6, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Farrah Johnson
published 3
3.06
Stacie Sonius
published
3.05
Catherine Zeberlein
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.01
Alison Cargo
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.97
Nancy Scoville
published
2.94
Kara Edmiston Lavaux
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.89
Christine Gish
published 3
2.80
Emily Dreyer
published 3
2.72
Kellie Naclerio
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacie Sonius + Kellie Naclerio421758% games+4.0% vs expected
Stacie Sonius + Catherine Zeberlein131152% games−0.3% vs expected
Kellie Naclerio + Catherine Zeberlein171354% games−0.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Farrah Johnson
58W–32L career · no lines in 2024
<1%14%86%
3.14
Stacie Sonius
86W–43L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.06
3.5
Catherine Zeberlein
165W–97L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.05
3
Alison Cargo
51W–32L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%46%54%
3.01
Nancy Scoville
33W–20L career · no lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
2.97
3
Kara Edmiston Lavaux
57W–39L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Christine Gish
38W–33L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
2.89
3
Emily Dreyer
68W–83L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Kellie Naclerio
121W–72L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%94%2%
2.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.