Teams

KC-CC RED

2024 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO

9 players · average NTRP 3.12 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-04-27vs PH GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesJudy Delzell / Monica Sheehy vs Ann Gallagher / Stacey Hawes6-2, 6-3
2024-04-21vs NJ REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesNatalie Duncan / Christine Angelini vs Norma Crockett / Karen Stanley6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJenna Masiello / Monica Sheehy vs Kristina Klug / Laura Conway6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2024-04-13vs LEBTC REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKaitlin Vellore / Heather Miner vs Emily Dreyer / Catherine Zeberlein6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJenna Masiello / Christine Angelini vs Kara Edmiston Lavaux / Christine Gish7-5, 0-6, 0-1
2024-04-10vs LEBTC BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesChristine Angelini / Jenna Masiello vs Jennifer Flint / Deborah Jenson6-7, 5-7
2024-03-30vs NJ GREENSplit 11
W#1 SinglesKaitlin Vellore vs Denise Champion6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJudy Delzell / Monica Sheehy vs Bonita Thistle / Katie Keighley5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Kaitlin Vellore
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.04
Mallory Clark
published
3.02
Natalie Duncan
published
2.84
Judy Delzell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Jenna Masiello
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Christine Angelini
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Heather Miner
published
Lori Galyk
published
Monica Sheehy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenna Masiello + Judy Delzell6849% games+4.0% vs expected
Jenna Masiello + Mallory Clark2450% games−2.8% vs expected
Jenna Masiello + Christine Angelini4351% games−7.0% vs expected
Christine Angelini + Judy Delzell1644% gamesnot enough data
Judy Delzell + Mallory Clark4163% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kaitlin Vellore
70W–25L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Mallory Clark
26W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%37%63%
3.04
Natalie Duncan
1W–8L career · no lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.02
3
Judy Delzell
59W–41L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Jenna Masiello
58W–73L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Christine Angelini
92W–94L career · 3 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
2.60
Heather Miner
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lori Galyk
12W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Monica Sheehy
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.