Teams

UPTA55A/Fischer/Tryon Park

2025 UPTA Adult 55 & Over - USTA · 55 Adult Women - 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-26vs UPTA55A/Rushing/RiversideLost 03
L#1 DoublesJane Koubek / Christina Burnette vs Teri Rushing / Mary Walsh5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSandra Hagler / Linda Wilson vs Nancy Kohl / Lori Fremaint6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRebecca Haas / Lisette Missler vs Birgitte Ahrberg / Cristina Koehler0-6, 3-6
2025-03-06vs UPTA55A/Rushing/RiversideWon 21
L#1 DoublesNancy Dreiding / Jennifer Tuttle vs Teri Rushing / Mary Walsh0-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRebecca Haas / Christina Burnette vs Nancy Kohl / Alison Frazier3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesYuriko Centa / Carlynn Eisner vs Suzanne Morris / Cristina Koehler6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 Adult Women - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Christina Burnette
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.48
Jane Koubek
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Carol Rabel
published 4
3.32
Jennifer Tuttle
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.28
Rebecca Haas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Sandra Hagler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Yuriko Centa
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Nancy Dreiding
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Angela Joffe
published 3.5
3.10
Yanxia Zhao
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Carlynn Eisner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Katie Saad
published
Joan Smith
published
Lisette Missler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rhonda Fischer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Rabel + Nancy Dreiding3348% games+4.3% vs expected
Jane Koubek + Rebecca Haas3250% gamesnot enough data
Jane Koubek + Sandra Hagler224 matchesnot enough data
Christina Burnette + Sandra Hagler404 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Tuttle + Rebecca Haas314 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Haas + Sandra Hagler134 matchesnot enough data
Jane Koubek + Christina Burnette123 matchesnot enough data
Katie Saad + Christina Burnette303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christina Burnette
38W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
Jane Koubek
20W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.48
4
Carol Rabel
39W–33L career · no lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.45
Jennifer Tuttle
32W–21L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Rebecca Haas
41W–69L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.28
Sandra Hagler
50W–31L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.25
Yuriko Centa
7W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
97%3%<1%
3.23
Nancy Dreiding
25W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.22
3.5
Angela Joffe
28W–34L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Yanxia Zhao
3W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.10
3.5
Carlynn Eisner
4W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.05
Katie Saad
22W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
Joan Smith
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisette Missler
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rhonda Fischer
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.