Teams

SFV - Lone Servivors 3.0

2024 Team Singles 18+ SFV Fall · SFV 18+ Men 3.0 Singles

8 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-24vs SFV - Paseo Deuces WildSplit 11
W#1 SinglesVarun Sahai vs Reginald Polk6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesJames Villamayor vs Jason O'Leary6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2024-11-17vs SFV - Toluca Lake TempestWon 30
W#1 SinglesVarun Sahai vs Joshua Pevnick5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesPhillippe Dela Pena vs Timothy Loo7-6, 6-1
W#3 SinglesJames Villamayor vs Jonathan Rosenthal3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-11-02vs SFV - Toluca Lake TempestWon 30
W#1 SinglesFederico Martell Jr vs Joshua Pevnick6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJames Villamayor vs Jonathan Rosenthal6-4, 6-2
W#3 SinglesPhillippe Dela Pena vs Hemky Madera6-2, 6-1
2024-10-26vs SFV - Toluca Lake TempestWon 30
W#1 SinglesRaffi Sahakyan vs Mark Cwern6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesJames Villamayor vs Jonathan Rosenthal6-4, 6-0
W#3 SinglesPhillippe Dela Pena vs Hemky Madera6-3, 7-6
2024-10-13vs SFV - Paseo Deuces WildWon 20
W#1 SinglesVarun Sahai vs Mauricio Solis6-2, 7-5
W#2 SinglesFederico Martell Jr vs Jason O'Leary6-2, 6-2
2024-10-06vs SFV - Paseo Deuces WildSplit 11
L#1 SinglesVarun Sahai vs Mauricio Solis2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesFederico Martell Jr vs Reginald Polk6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18+ Men 3.0 Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Jaime Tovar
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 4
Anthony Gonzalez
published 3
2.54
Chris Fragoso
published 3
Federico Martell Jr
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
James Villamayor
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
Phillippe Dela Pena
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Raffi Sahakyan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Varun Sahai
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Federico Martell Jr + Chris Fragoso123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jaime Tovar
125W–29L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.86
3
Anthony Gonzalez
5W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Chris Fragoso
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
2.54
Federico Martell Jr
12W–2L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
James Villamayor
4W–3L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Phillippe Dela Pena
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Raffi Sahakyan
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Varun Sahai
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.