Teams

Boomshakalaka

2023 USTA ADULT 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

18 players · average NTRP 3.64 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-07vs Tennisity 18Lost 01
L#3 DoublesCari Massie / Lori Ewing vs Kathy Christensen / Heather Linhart4-6, 2-6
2023-06-23vs Net ResultsLost 01
L#3 DoublesMelanie Mitchell / Cari Massie vs Shelley Hunter / Heidi Stipp2-6, 3-6
2023-06-19Won 10
W#1 DoublesVirginia Watterson / Krista Perry vs Suzie Wilson / Cynthia Copple6-1, 6-2
2023-05-31vs No Strings AttachedLost 01
L#2 DoublesLori Ewing / Virginia Watterson vs Dina Bostock / Kelly Haskell2-6, 0-6
2023-05-24vs LOVE HurtsWon 10
W#1 DoublesKrista Perry / Virginia Watterson vs Laura Stento / Tory Goltry6-4, 6-1
2023-05-22vs Serve Me A Double 4.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesCari Massie / Lisa della Badia vs Paula Lawson / Debbie Merritt4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Tennisity 18111481233425
2Serve Me A Double 4.0102471331364
3LOVE Hurts75352563529
4No Strings Attached75332765540
5Net Results66303067519
6Boomshakalaka39204086570

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Krista Perry
published 4
3.65
Angie O'Hara
published 4
3.58
Dorsey Wanless
published 4
3.48
Stacey Walker
published 3.5
3.43
Jane Perlaky
published 3.5
3.39
Zel Mertz
published 3.5
3.37
Deniz Aygen
published 3.5
3.36
Kimberlee Megale
published 3.5
3.32
Leann Gilberg
published 3.5
3.30
Lori Ewing
published 3.5
3.27
Kiley Holt
published 3.5
Cari Massie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Christy Siemons
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 14% · published 3.5
3.00
Lisa della Badia
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Melanie Mitchell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Nancy Edwards
published
Virginia Watterson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christy Siemons + Dorsey Wanless14856% games+11.2% vs expected
Lori Ewing + Krista Perry5449% games+9.6% vs expected
Zel Mertz + Jennifer Mitchell351459% games+4.3% vs expected
Jennifer Mitchell + Jane Perlaky243647% games+1.6% vs expected
Leann Gilberg + Kimberlee Megale7946% games+0.3% vs expected
Leann Gilberg + Angie O'Hara202944% games−3.5% vs expected
Lori Ewing + Jane Perlaky3647% games−10.5% vs expected
Melanie Mitchell + Lori Ewing203242% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Krista Perry
64W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Angie O'Hara
91W–153L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Dorsey Wanless
122W–94L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.58
3.5
Stacey Walker
73W–54L career · no lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Jane Perlaky
146W–185L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Zel Mertz
335W–191L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Deniz Aygen
149W–60L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Kimberlee Megale
183W–106L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Leann Gilberg
126W–186L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Lori Ewing
92W–137L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Kiley Holt
45W–67L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Cari Massie
46W–96L career · type S · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Christy Siemons
78W–79L career · 7 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
4
Jennifer Mitchell
164W–142L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
3.00
Lisa della Badia
168W–91L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Melanie Mitchell
68W–106L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Edwards
21W–31L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Virginia Watterson
12W–11L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.