Ustach 18s 3.5W Mon PM
2026 Piedmont USTA 18 & Over · WOMEN 3.5 18 & Over
15 players · average NTRP 3.44 / NORTH CAROLINA
No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.
Schedule8 played
i
Flight standings13 teams · WOMEN 3.5 18 & Over
| Team | W | L | Sets lost | Games lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Goy 18s 3.5W Mon PM | 8 | 0 | 14 | 222 |
| 2Baker 18s 3.5W Mon AM | 8 | 0 | 23 | 257 |
| 3Ustach 18s 3.5W Mon PM | 7 | 1 | 28 | 265 |
| 4Tuhro 18s 3.5W Mon AM | 5 | 3 | 33 | 329 |
| 5Clift/Cope 18s 3.5W Mon PM | 5 | 3 | 41 | 338 |
| 6Davis/Durham 18s 3.5W Mon PM | 4 | 4 | 49 | 382 |
| 7Choros/Dagger 18s 3.5W Mon PM | 3 | 5 | 50 | 372 |
| 8Rike 18s 3.5W Mon AM | 3 | 5 | 57 | 399 |
| 9Esson 18s 3.5W Mon PM | 2 | 6 | 55 | 392 |
| 10Herron/Berreth 18s 3.5W Mon AM | 2 | 6 | 56 | 397 |
| 11Phelps 18s 3.5W Mon PM | 2 | 6 | 59 | 411 |
| 12Mohorn/Gingerich 18s 3.5W Mon AM | 2 | 6 | 61 | 422 |
| 13Murphy/Fields 18s 3.5W Mon PM | 1 | 7 | 63 | 427 |
Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays
Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.
Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.
| Kelly Glick + Jennifer Klein | 5–1 | 64% games | +11.7% vs expected |
| Kelly Glick + Megan Noltemeyer | 5–0 | 63% games | +0.0% vs expected |
| Kelly Glick + Erin Cockman | 3–1 | 4 matches | not enough data |
| Megan Noltemeyer + Erin Cockman | 4–0 | 4 matches | not enough data |
| Erin Cockman + Michele Matthews | 4–0 | 4 matches | not enough data |
| Ginger Ballard + Caroline Yates | 3–1 | 4 matches | not enough data |
| Betsy Hooper + Casey Emmendorfer | 3–0 | 3 matches | not enough data |
| Jennifer Klein + Megan Noltemeyer | 3–0 | 3 matches | not enough data |
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.
Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.