Teams

Toro

2025 Anne Arundel Singles · Anne Arundel Singles 3.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-06vs ElcockWon 10
W#2 SinglesCharles Mandeville vs Trevon Jensen6-4, 6-2
2025-10-29vs ElcockLost 02
L#1 SinglesDavid Djajaputra vs Patrick Bernhard5-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesCharles Mandeville vs Quentin Cummings4-6, 5-7
2025-10-23vs ElcockWon 20
W#2 SinglesCharles Mandeville vs Tim Cogar6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 SinglesMichael Scoglio vs Damien Morris6-1, 7-5
2025-10-16vs ElcockSplit 11
L#2 SinglesDavid Djajaputra vs Trevon Jensen5-7, 4-6
W#3 SinglesCharles Mandeville vs Stan Williams6-1, 6-1
2025-10-11vs ElcockWon 20
W#1 SinglesDavid Djajaputra vs Tyler Caccamo2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMichael Scoglio vs Stan Williams6-1, 6-2
2025-10-01vs ElcockLost 12
W#1 SinglesGreg Singh vs Tim Cogar6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesAlejandro Carrera vs David Pim4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesJose Toro vs Tyler Caccamo6-7, 6-7
2025-09-27vs ElcockWon 20
W#2 SinglesCharles Mandeville vs Quentin Cummings5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 SinglesMichael Scoglio vs Damien Morris6-4, 6-4
2025-09-13vs ElcockLost 12
L#1 SinglesTom Erdely vs Patrick Bernhard7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesGreg Singh vs Damien Morris6-2, 6-0
L#3 SinglesJose Toro vs Tim Cogar3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Singles 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Tom Erdely
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.10
Greg Singh
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Charles Mandeville
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3
3.02
David Djajaputra
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.90
Michael Scoglio
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.86
Jose Toro
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.83
Alejandro Carrera
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.44
Curt Schwab
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jose Toro + Alejandro Carrera4263% games+8.5% vs expected
David Djajaputra + Jose Toro5258% games+5.0% vs expected
Jose Toro + Tom Erdely134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tom Erdely
27W–57L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Greg Singh
14W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.10
3
Charles Mandeville
53W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.08
3
David Djajaputra
139W–206L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Michael Scoglio
22W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.90
Jose Toro
31W–69L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Alejandro Carrera
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%10%
2.83
2.5
Curt Schwab
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%68%32%
2.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.