Teams

Drennan/Malone 40 5.5

2025 South East Tennis Combo 40 & OVER · Women 5.5

14 players · average NTRP 2.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-21vs Mika (DAY)Won 30
W#1 DoublesPatricia Furbay / Julia Vogt vs Janet King / Helen Gainer6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCarol Drennan / Catherine Gill vs Judith Laico / Karen Rios7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesFaye Serkin / Diane Byrd vs Sarah Brand / Lynda Johnston6-4, 6-0
2025-10-19vs Peele CFCC Combo 5.5Lost 12
W#1 DoublesCarol Drennan / Alice Weiser vs Lizzie Hartman / Jessica Humphries2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAileen Sutton / Diana Lancaster vs Beth Peele / Brittany Witmer3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHeather Martin / Eleni Pappamihiel vs Happy Clark / Allycen Garner3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-10-05vs King/Reeves 40+ Combo '25Won 30
W#1 DoublesCarol Drennan / Catherine Gill vs Terri Smith / Wendy Downing6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Pennington / Diana Lancaster vs Brenda Reeves / Amy Beall6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesEleni Pappamihiel / Leslie Houston vs Sheila Finnicum / Donna Sloan6-4, 6-4
2025-09-23vs Peele CFCC Combo 5.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesHeather Martin / Patricia Furbay vs Heather Nichols / Beth Peele6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLeslie Houston / Catherine Gill vs Brittany Witmer / Allycen Garner1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLarissa Malone / Diane Byrd vs Nancy Bailey / Christina Etters6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-09-14vs Mika (DAY)Won 30
W#1 DoublesCarol Drennan / Alice Weiser vs Judith Laico / JoAnne Paul6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLarissa Malone / Heather Martin vs Marian Henze / Lindsay Sanford6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLeslie Houston / Eleni Pappamihiel vs Ann Boser / April Robbins6-1, 7-5
2025-09-09vs King/Reeves 40+ Combo '25Won 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Pennington / Julia Vogt vs Elizabeth Cain / Becky Benson6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesNicole Janawsky / Catherine Gill vs Donna Sloan / Tina Wagner6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesFaye Serkin / Diana Lancaster vs Terri Smith / Valerie Oldfield6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Patricia Furbay
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.07
Julia Vogt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.98
Alice Weiser
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.94
Heather Martin
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.92
Jennifer Pennington
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
2.86
Larissa Malone
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.86
Nicole Janawsky
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.74
Diana Lancaster
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.73
Aileen Sutton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.66
Carol Drennan
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.61
Faye Serkin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Diane Byrd
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.50
Leslie Houston
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.49
Eleni Pappamihiel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alice Weiser + Diana Lancaster5168% games+17.5% vs expected
Heather Martin + Larissa Malone4261% gamesnot enough data
Heather Martin + Patricia Furbay404 matchesnot enough data
Heather Martin + Diana Lancaster404 matchesnot enough data
Carol Drennan + Alice Weiser404 matchesnot enough data
Aileen Sutton + Alice Weiser134 matchesnot enough data
Aileen Sutton + Eleni Pappamihiel314 matchesnot enough data
Heather Martin + Carol Drennan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patricia Furbay
54W–31L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.11
Julia Vogt
61W–18L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.07
3
Alice Weiser
52W–28L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.98
Heather Martin
30W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
Jennifer Pennington
38W–27L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
2.92
Larissa Malone
43W–38L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
Nicole Janawsky
18W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
2.86
2.5
Diana Lancaster
32W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%4%96%
2.74
3
Aileen Sutton
15W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Carol Drennan
29W–34L career · 7 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
Faye Serkin
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.61
2.5
Diane Byrd
30W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%36%64%
2.55
Leslie Houston
14W–19L career · 6 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
2.50
Eleni Pappamihiel
22W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%53%47%
2.49

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.