Teams

Mika (DAY)

2025 South East Tennis Combo 40 & OVER · Women 5.5

13 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-21vs Drennan/Malone 40 5.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJanet King / Helen Gainer vs Patricia Furbay / Julia Vogt4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJudith Laico / Karen Rios vs Carol Drennan / Catherine Gill5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSarah Brand / Lynda Johnston vs Faye Serkin / Diane Byrd4-6, 0-6
2025-10-19vs MacLeanWon 21
W#1 DoublesMarian Henze / Karen Rios vs Nicole Aristy / Penelope Taylor6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJoAnna Mika / Lynda Johnston vs Beth Saile / Amy Ford6-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJanet King / April Robbins vs Erin Shuttleworth / Beth Bianchi6-1, 6-2
2025-10-05vs Peele CFCC Combo 5.5Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAnn Boser / Karen Rios vs Lizzie Hartman / Allycen Garner6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJudith Laico / JoAnne Paul vs Nancy Bailey / Jessica Humphries4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJoAnna Mika / Lindsay Sanford vs Brittany Witmer / Happy Clark2-6, 1-6
2025-09-28vs Russell/McCain 5.5 Combo Over 40Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLynda Johnston / Marian Henze vs Alicia Rineer / Bess Hilliard3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJoAnna Mika / JoAnne Paul vs Tracie West / Dee Schmid4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesApril Robbins / Judith Laico vs Patricia Wilson / Rachel Mclean4-6, 2-6
2025-09-23vs MacLeanWon 21
W#1 DoublesMarian Henze / Helen Gainer vs Lauren Hollett-Mott / Erin Shuttleworth2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJudith Laico / Pamela Rommelmeyer vs Emily Mussell / Jaime Helms4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAnn Boser / Lindsay Sanford vs Steph DuPre / Amy Ford3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-09-14vs Drennan/Malone 40 5.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJudith Laico / JoAnne Paul vs Carol Drennan / Alice Weiser1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMarian Henze / Lindsay Sanford vs Larissa Malone / Heather Martin1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAnn Boser / April Robbins vs Leslie Houston / Eleni Pappamihiel1-6, 5-7
2025-09-09vs Peele CFCC Combo 5.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMarian Henze / Lynda Johnston vs Heather Nichols / Allycen Garner6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHelen Gainer / JoAnna Mika vs Kelly van der Vaart / Rachel Colonna6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJudith Laico / April Robbins vs Brittany Witmer / Christina Etters6-7, 2-6
2025-09-04vs Russell/McCain 5.5 Combo Over 40Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAnn Boser / Helen Gainer vs Pamela Vest / Yuko McDonald2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMarian Henze / Karen Rios vs Kara Gansmann / Sehr Belle2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSarah Brand / Pamela Rommelmeyer vs Tracie West / Bess Hilliard0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Helen Gainer
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.80
Dianne Linderoth
published 3
2.70
JoAnna Mika
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.67
Ann Boser
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.65
Sarah Brand
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Marian Henze
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.52
Karen Rios
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.50
Lynda Johnston
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.45
Judith Laico
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.21
Lindsay Sanford
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.06
Pamela Rommelmeyer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.05
April Robbins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
JoAnne Paul
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judith Laico + Karen Rios033 matchesnot enough data
Karen Rios + JoAnna Mika123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Helen Gainer
63W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Dianne Linderoth
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
JoAnna Mika
9W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Ann Boser
10W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
2.67
Sarah Brand
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
2.65
Marian Henze
6W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
2.56
Karen Rios
16W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
Lynda Johnston
6W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
2.50
Judith Laico
4W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
2.45
Lindsay Sanford
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.21
Pamela Rommelmeyer
5W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.06
2.5
April Robbins
3W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.05
JoAnne Paul
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.