Teams

EB: O'Keefe

2026 RI Adult 18 & Over Women · 4.5 Women 1

17 players · average NTRP 4.12 / RHODE ISLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-19vs CC: Hay/BrickleWon 10
W#2 DoublesMIchele Green / Jackie Drolet vs Adriana Minacapilli / Theresa Pereira6-1, 6-4
2026-07-17vs CC: Hay/BrickleLost 01
L#1 SinglesPatricia Katsaros vs Lindsey Brickle3-6, 0-6
2026-06-28vs CC: Hay/BrickleWon 21
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Birbiglia / Sophia Delosreyes vs Lindsey Brickle / Clare Okeefe6-2, 3-6, 3-5
W#2 DoublesMari Bianco / Hilary Fagan vs Nicole Snape / Liraz Zalika3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLauren Freitas / Suzanne Komari vs Adriana Minacapilli / Lauren MacEra3-6, 6-2, 2-1
2026-06-25vs CC: Hay/BrickleWon 40
W#1 DoublesCarolyn Birbiglia / Sophia Delosreyes vs Clare Okeefe / Lindsey Brickle2-6, 6-1, 5-4
W#1 SinglesJackie Drolet vs Lauren MacEra6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRuth Furman / Nicole Dias vs Grace Murphy / Adriana Minacapilli6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMIchele Green / Meghan OKeefe vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-14vs CC: Hay/BrickleWon 30
W#1 SinglesRuth Furman vs Clare Okeefe6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLauren Freitas / Nicole Dias vs Lindsey Brickle / Karen Genereux5-7, 6-3, 2-0
W#3 DoublesNicole Breting / MIchele Green vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-01vs CC: Hay/BrickleWon 30
W#1 DoublesMeghan OKeefe / Nicole Breting vs Adriana Minacapilli / Lauren MacEra6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHilary Fagan / Carolyn Birbiglia vs Grace Murphy / Karen Genereux6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesRuth Furman vs Liraz Zalika6-1, 6-0
2026-05-26vs CC: Hay/BrickleWon 21
W#1 DoublesMeghan OKeefe / Sophia Delosreyes vs Lindsey Brickle / Lauren MacEra6-3, 7-5
L#1 SinglesBianca Biglione vs Sadie Campanella3-6, 4-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRuth Furman / Carolyn Birbiglia vs Madigan Murphy / Grace Murphy6-2, 6-3
2026-05-03vs CC: Hay/BrickleWon 32
L#1 DoublesMeghan OKeefe / Sophia Delosreyes vs Jessica Hay / Nicole Snape2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesSuzanne Komari vs Clare Okeefe3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNicole Breting / Carolyn Birbiglia vs Liraz Zalika / Erin Cavanagh6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesBianca Biglione vs Madigan Murphy6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRuth Furman / Mari Bianco vs Lauren MacEra / Lindsey Brickle2-6, 6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 4.5 Women 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WB: 18+ Breakers/Zizza/Komari08271331306
2WB: DePalma/Marfeo08261432302
3RP: Leso/Vaudrain08231741354
4EB: O'Keefe08132757396
5FC: 4018/Mangiaratti08112958405

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.94 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bianca Biglione
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.20
Sophia Delosreyes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.18
Nicole Breting
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
4.12
Ruth Furman
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
4.08
Mari Bianco
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
4.03
Carolyn Birbiglia
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
4.01
MIchele Green
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.00
Hilary Fagan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.99
Lauren Freitas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.94
Jackie Drolet
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.88
Meghan OKeefe
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.78
Margot Bloom
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.74
Valerie Leso
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.73
Lindsay Cao
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Nicole Dias
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.71
Suzanne Komari
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 30% · published
Patricia Katsaros
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hilary Fagan + Carolyn Birbiglia14074% games+17.5% vs expected
Margot Bloom + Lindsay Cao5358% games+13.0% vs expected
Valerie Leso + MIchele Green17656% games+0.7% vs expected
Margot Bloom + Nicole Dias314 matchesnot enough data
Margot Bloom + MIchele Green123 matchesnot enough data
Ruth Furman + Meghan OKeefe303 matchesnot enough data
MIchele Green + Meghan OKeefe213 matchesnot enough data
Suzanne Komari + Lauren Freitas213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Bianca Biglione
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sophia Delosreyes
4W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
4.20
Nicole Breting
35W–14L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
4.18
Ruth Furman
18W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
4.12
Mari Bianco
54W–22L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
4.08
4
Carolyn Birbiglia
109W–58L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
4.03
MIchele Green
142W–81L career · 3 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
4.01
4
Hilary Fagan
97W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
4.00
Lauren Freitas
95W–28L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.99
4
Jackie Drolet
5W–0L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.94
Meghan OKeefe
106W–83L career · 5 lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
3.88
Margot Bloom
129W–65L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.78
Valerie Leso
58W–42L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
Lindsay Cao
128W–52L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
Nicole Dias
81W–34L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.72
Suzanne Komari
92W–94L career · 9 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.71
Patricia Katsaros
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.