Teams

CC: Hay/Brickle

2026 RI Adult 18 & Over Women · 4.5 Women 1

15 players · average NTRP 4.17 / RHODE ISLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-19vs EB: O'KeefeLost 02
L#1 DoublesLindsey Brickle / Karen Genereux vs Meghan OKeefe / Carolyn Birbiglia4-6, 6-4, 1-4
L#2 DoublesAdriana Minacapilli / Theresa Pereira vs MIchele Green / Jackie Drolet1-6, 4-6
2026-07-17vs EB: O'KeefeWon 10
W#1 SinglesLindsey Brickle vs Patricia Katsaros6-3, 6-0
2026-06-28vs EB: O'KeefeLost 12
W#1 DoublesLindsey Brickle / Clare Okeefe vs Carolyn Birbiglia / Sophia Delosreyes2-6, 6-3, 5-3
L#2 DoublesNicole Snape / Liraz Zalika vs Mari Bianco / Hilary Fagan6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAdriana Minacapilli / Lauren MacEra vs Lauren Freitas / Suzanne Komari6-3, 2-6, 1-2
2026-06-25vs EB: O'KeefeLost 03
L#1 DoublesClare Okeefe / Lindsey Brickle vs Carolyn Birbiglia / Sophia Delosreyes6-2, 1-6, 4-5
L#1 SinglesLauren MacEra vs Jackie Drolet1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGrace Murphy / Adriana Minacapilli vs Ruth Furman / Nicole Dias1-6, 2-6
2026-06-14vs EB: O'KeefeLost 03
L#1 DoublesJessica Hay / Nicole Snape vs Margot Bloom / Lindsay Cao3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesClare Okeefe vs Ruth Furman3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLindsey Brickle / Karen Genereux vs Lauren Freitas / Nicole Dias7-5, 3-6, 0-2
2026-06-01vs EB: O'KeefeLost 04
L#1 DoublesAdriana Minacapilli / Lauren MacEra vs Meghan OKeefe / Nicole Breting3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesClare Okeefe vs Mari Bianco3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGrace Murphy / Karen Genereux vs Hilary Fagan / Carolyn Birbiglia0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesLiraz Zalika vs Ruth Furman1-6, 0-6
2026-05-26vs EB: O'KeefeLost 13
L#1 DoublesLindsey Brickle / Lauren MacEra vs Meghan OKeefe / Sophia Delosreyes3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesSadie Campanella vs Bianca Biglione6-3, 3-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMadigan Murphy / Grace Murphy vs Ruth Furman / Carolyn Birbiglia2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTheresa Pereira / Karen Genereux vs Margot Bloom / Mari Bianco2-6, 3-6
2026-05-03vs EB: O'KeefeLost 23
W#1 DoublesJessica Hay / Nicole Snape vs Meghan OKeefe / Sophia Delosreyes6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesClare Okeefe vs Suzanne Komari6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLiraz Zalika / Erin Cavanagh vs Nicole Breting / Carolyn Birbiglia0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesMadigan Murphy vs Bianca Biglione0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLauren MacEra / Lindsey Brickle vs Ruth Furman / Mari Bianco6-2, 1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.53
Sadie Campanella
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.36
Cara Freadman
published 4.5
4.09
Nicole Snape
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.02
Lauren MacEra
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.98
Jessica Hay
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.94
Clare Okeefe
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.88
Lindsey Brickle
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 14% · published
3.69
Theresa Pereira
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.69
Karen Genereux
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.68
Adriana Minacapilli
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.65
Madigan Murphy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.61
Grace Murphy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Liraz Zalika
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Erin Cavanagh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Parisa Beers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cara Freadman + Sadie Campanella5166% games+8.8% vs expected
Karen Genereux + Sadie Campanella10367% games+4.1% vs expected
Jessica Hay + Nicole Snape8655% games−3.5% vs expected
Karen Genereux + Theresa Pereira123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sadie Campanella
105W–45L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%42%58%
4.53
4.5
Cara Freadman
26W–9L career · no lines in 2026
1%84%15%
4.36
Nicole Snape
15W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
4.09
Lauren MacEra
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
4.02
Jessica Hay
23W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.98
4
Clare Okeefe
63W–41L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.94
Lindsey Brickle
23W–22L career · 7 lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
3.88
Theresa Pereira
10W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Karen Genereux
118W–72L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
3.69
4
Adriana Minacapilli
43W–36L career · 7 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
Madigan Murphy
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.65
Grace Murphy
13W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.61
Liraz Zalika
0W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
3.48
Erin Cavanagh
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Parisa Beers
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.