Teams

KY/LEX/Parrish/Morrow

2026 USTA COMBO 40 & OVER LEXINGTON · 7.5 ADULT WOMEN

16 players · average NTRP 3.75 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-08-18vs KY/LEX/CastleWon 30
W#1 DoublesJanna Francisco / Julia Hollon vs Doris Senters / Sarah Sparks6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCamille Morrow / Emily Pernice vs Whitney Byard / Billie Walters7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesErin Azbell / Catherine Richmond vs Lori Brunner / Kelly Moore7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 ADULT WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Camille Morrow
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
Katie Parrish
published
3.85
Janna Francisco
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Lisa Combs
published
3.78
Anne Faulconer
published 4
3.66
Julia Hollon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Erin Azbell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Ruth Anna Swacker
published
3.46
Lucy Butt
published
3.42
Cynthia Yeiser
published 3.5
3.41
Teela Watts
published
3.34
Emily Pernice
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.34
Jordan Reeves
published
3.26
Paige Bensing
published
Catherine Richmond
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Lindsey Kretz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lucy Butt + Ruth Anna Swacker12267% games+11.8% vs expected
Erin Azbell + Jordan Reeves15361% games+11.2% vs expected
Katie Parrish + Camille Morrow10461% games+3.3% vs expected
Cynthia Yeiser + Emily Pernice4259% games+0.0% vs expected
Anne Faulconer + Lisa Combs033 matchesnot enough data
Cynthia Yeiser + Catherine Richmond213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Camille Morrow
22W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.89
Katie Parrish
23W–9L career · no lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.85
Janna Francisco
12W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
1%85%14%
3.85
Lisa Combs
8W–13L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Anne Faulconer
23W–16L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
Julia Hollon
12W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
12%87%1%
3.66
Erin Azbell
23W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
13%86%1%
3.66
Ruth Anna Swacker
24W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
Lucy Butt
23W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Cynthia Yeiser
19W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%72%27%
3.42
Teela Watts
17W–11L career · no lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
Emily Pernice
29W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
Jordan Reeves
17W–4L career · no lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
3.34
Paige Bensing
43W–12L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Catherine Richmond
7W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Lindsey Kretz
5W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.