← Search

Lucy Butt

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lexington, KY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
123 matches · 87W–36L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history123 matches
L
2026-09-27 · KY/LEX/Parrish/Morrow · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Combs
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-09-20 · KY/LEX/Parrish/Morrow · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Anne Faulconer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-23 · KY/LEX/Parrish/Morrow · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Combs
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-19 · KY/LEX/Pernice/Dickens · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth Anna Swacker championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-06-19 · KY/LEX/Pernice/Dickens · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth Anna Swacker championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-03-15 · KY/LEX/Morrow/Parrish 4.0 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ruth Anna Swacker
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-03-14 · Acin' Voorhees · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Ruth Anna Swacker
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-03-14 · Acin' Voorhees · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Madison Liford
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-02-26 · KY/LEX/Morrow/Parrish 4.0 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ruth Anna Swacker
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-20 · KY/LEX/Pernice/Dickens · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth Anna Swacker
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-02-16 · KY/LEX/Pernice/Dickens · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Davis Dickens
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-01-10 · KY/LEX/Pernice/Dickens · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth Anna Swacker
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5
92.3%
12W–1L · 68.3% of games
3.0
75%
30W–10L · 63.1% of games
3.5
63.3%
19W–11L · 57.4% of games
4.0
60%
3W–2L · 56.2% of games
5.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 51.1% of games
6.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 53.6% of games
7.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 61.2% of games
3.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
33 matches
#1 Singles
17%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
16 matches
#2 Singles
6%
7 matches
#3 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer