← Search

Madison Liford

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lexington, KY
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
139 matches · 75W–64L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history139 matches
W
2026-10-09 · KY/LEX/Johns/Sheehy · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Johns
loading the estimate
5-4
L
2026-09-14 · KY/LEX/Albrecht/Walker · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Marvetta Overstreet
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Taylor Wilcox championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Taylor Wilcox championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-19 · KY/LEX/Pernice/Dickens · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Davis Dickens championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-06 · KY/LEX/Walker/Johns/Albrecht · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annie Wallin
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-23 · KY/LEX/Walker/Johns/Albrecht · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Johns
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-03-16 · KY/LEX/Walker/Johns/Albrecht · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Pearson
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-03-14 · Acin' Voorhees · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Davis Dickens
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-03-14 · Acin' Voorhees · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Lucy Butt
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-03-06 · KY/LEX/Pernice/Dickens · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leah Lykins
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-03 · KY/LEX/Johns · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lee Ann Sheehy
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams57 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5
60%
18W–12L · 54.6% of games
3.0
56.9%
29W–22L · 53.9% of games
3.5
35.7%
10W–18L · 43.4% of games
5.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
50%
4W–4L · 46.5% of games
6.5
50%
3W–3L · 46.2% of games
3.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 63% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
57 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
15 matches
#1 Singles
5%
7 matches
#2 Singles
5%
7 matches
#3 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova