← Search

Davis Dickens

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lexington, KY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
120 matches · 65W–55L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history120 matches
W
2026-08-18 · KY/LEX/Albrecht/Walker · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Taylor Wilcox
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-19 · KY/LEX/Pernice/Dickens · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Madison Liford championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-19 · KY/LEX/Pernice/Dickens · #2 Singles · 3.5 championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-03 · KY/LEX/Overstreet · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-03-23 · KY/LEX/Overstreet · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Overstreet
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-14 · Acin' Voorhees · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Madison Liford
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-03-14 · Acin' Voorhees · #1 Mixed Doubles · 0.0 · with Dustin Ingram mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-13 · Acin' Voorhees · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Sophie Schmidt
loading the estimate
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-20 · KY/LEX/Overstreet · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Overstreet
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-02-16 · KY/LEX/Pernice/Dickens · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lucy Butt
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
Default
2026-02-02 · KY/LEX/Pernice/Dickens · #2 Singles · 3.5
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-01-30 · KY/LEX/Pernice/Dickens · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
0.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5
76.5%
13W–4L · 62.4% of games
3.0
55.9%
19W–15L · 52.9% of games
3.5
45.5%
20W–24L · 48.1% of games
4.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 41.6% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 48.1% of games
6.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 28% of the time
#1 Singles
28%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
22 matches
#2 Singles
13%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
16 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams