Teams

Team 5

2022 NOVA Combo Mixed · NOVA Combo Mixed 6.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.42 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-11-13vs Team 3 Dare DoublesWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulian Collier / Amanda Kerr vs Nathan Bergman / Stephanie Wright6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2022-11-02vs Team 1 High RollersLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrian Lochhead / Vanita Deames vs Sharon Sabasteanski / Robert Smith3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChuck Lutes / Christina Saxon vs Jose Miguel Sacin / Zoe Huang1-6, 1-6
2022-10-28vs Team 2Won 20
W#2 DoublesMichelle Brown / Julian Collier vs Diane Fletcher / Daniel Aronowitz6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChristina Saxon / Brian Lochhead vs Holly Rasmussen / Keith Wojciech6-4, 3-1
2022-10-26vs Team 1 High RollersWon 10
W#3 DoublesTara Reynolds / Julian Collier vs Ivan Kozliak / Zoe Huang6-2, 5-4
2022-10-12vs Team 3 Dare DoublesSplit 11
W#2 DoublesBrian Lochhead / Robin Crawford vs Yong Jae Lee / Nancy Rowland6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesChuck Lutes / Amanda Kerr vs Cynthia Grubbs / Samuel Ryan3-6, 3-6
2022-09-28vs Team 2Lost 12
W#1 DoublesJulian Collier / Robin Crawford vs Douglas Levy / Jenny Gillespie3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesVanita Deames / Brian Lochhead vs Carter Wilkinson / Holly Rasmussen3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesChuck Lutes / Kristy Mathey vs Keith Wojciech / Denise Weinig6-3, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Combo Mixed 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Amanda Kerr
published 4
3.44
Tara Reynolds
published
Emily Covington
published 3.5
3.15
James Shevlin
published 3.5
3.14
Julian Collier
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.88
Kristy Mathey
published
2.82
Brian Lochhead
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.48
Chuck Lutes
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Judson Brown
published
Robin Crawford
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amanda Kerr
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.82
Tara Reynolds
6W–10L career · no lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
3.44
3.5
Emily Covington
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
James Shevlin
25W–26L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Julian Collier
50W–27L career · 4 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.14
Kristy Mathey
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Brian Lochhead
34W–23L career · type S · 4 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Chuck Lutes
14W–32L career · 3 lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.48
Judson Brown
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Robin Crawford
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.