Teams

Heritage Bay - Beaudet

2023 Collier Adult 40 & Over Fall · Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-12-14vs Village Walk Bonita - MacwilliamsWon 20
W#1 DoublesJulie Lenhart / Cheryl Rauch vs Marketa Dieckmann / Amy Schiffer6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusie Beaudet / Tina Jaquess vs Marcia Erpenbeck / Ann Kremer6-3, 6-3
2022-12-07vs Marco YMCA - D. BurschWon 10
W#2 DoublesTina Jaquess / Sharon Sturges vs Renee Facciola / Julie Kastholm6-1, 6-3
2022-11-30Won 10
W#2 DoublesSharon Sturges / Cheryl Rauch vs Candy Brunton / Mindy Wagner6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSharon Sturges / Andrea Kansy vs Aimee Hummel / Marie Veintimilla2-6, 3-6
2022-10-26vs Marco YMCA - WashakWon 10
W#2 DoublesTina Jaquess / Victoria Pollock vs Corey Stranger / Kim Gallagher6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2022-10-19vs Quail West - DavisWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulie Lenhart / Cheryl Rauch vs Colleen Bresson / Marie Zinno6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Sharon Sturges
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.50
Julie Lenhart
published
3.42
Krista Lombardo
published
3.37
Susie Beaudet
published
3.37
Lucy Slaboch
published
3.32
Kathleen Fisch
published
3.29
Tiffany Moncrieff
published
3.25
Cheryl Rauch
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Angela Ricci
published 3.5
3.24
Tina Jaquess
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Victoria Pollock
published
2.77
Andrea Kansy
published 3
MOLLY LANE
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tina Jaquess + Victoria Pollock3447% games−6.9% vs expected
Tina Jaquess + Cheryl Rauch3347% gamesnot enough data
Susie Beaudet + Sharon Sturges213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sharon Sturges
85W–43L career · 3 lines in 2023
13%87%1%
3.66
Julie Lenhart
11W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.50
Krista Lombardo
17W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.42
Susie Beaudet
19W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.37
Lucy Slaboch
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.37
Kathleen Fisch
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
Tiffany Moncrieff
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Cheryl Rauch
106W–90L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Angela Ricci
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
Tina Jaquess
105W–80L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
Victoria Pollock
10W–13L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.10
3
Andrea Kansy
7W–1L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
MOLLY LANE
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.