Teams

Quail West - Davis

2023 Collier Adult 40 & Over Fall · Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.40 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesKatrina Tiedge / Suzie Crews vs Jennifer Brown / Sandra Frost6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKim Swope Schott / Michelle Minor vs Marina Eschoyez-Quiroga / Nikki Miller2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAndrea Steffy / Shirley Yagoda vs Brooke Sykes / Leticia Lancsarics1-6, 2-6
2022-12-07vs Olde Cypress - LoomisLost 12
W#1 DoublesJane Mills / Katrina Tiedge vs Katie Lober / Rosemary Rolak6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesPam Davis / Kim Swope Schott vs Marlea Bowser / Jeanette Thevening5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMarie Zinno / Karen Romine vs Holly Gwaltney / Carolyn Matthes6-7, 2-6
2022-11-30vs Marco YMCA - WashakLost 12
L#1 DoublesColleen Bresson / Natalie Cortese vs Bridget Smagala / Corey Stranger4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJane Mills vs Inge Lund6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKim Swope Schott / Valerie Barrett vs Mary Husted / Deb Dorsey3-6, 6-7
2022-11-21vs Marco YMCA - D. BurschLost 02
L#1 DoublesSuzie Crews / Natalie Cortese vs Shirley Steffen / Renee Facciola3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPam Davis / Shirley Yagoda vs Ricki Giersch / Susan Julich3-6, 2-6
2022-11-16vs Village Walk Bonita - MacwilliamsWon 30
W#1 DoublesMary Huber-Olk / Colleen Bresson vs Amy Schiffer / Marketa Dieckmann7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKim Swope Schott / Marie Zinno vs Marcia Erpenbeck / Leslie Prinz4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJane Mills / Shirley Yagoda vs Cid Settineri / Ava Garner6-3, 6-3
2022-11-02vs MediterraSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMarie Zinno / Valerie Barrett vs Laura King / Lisa Dailey3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNatalie Cortese / Mary Huber-Olk vs Grace Frey / Evelyn Mckoan6-2, 6-4
2022-10-26vs Talis Park - Hurt-SimmonsWon 20
W#1 DoublesMary Huber-Olk / Natalie Cortese vs Patty McClimans / Gail Sousa6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPam Davis / Kim Swope Schott vs Patricia Buonaiuto / Andrea Maatallah6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2022-10-19vs Heritage Bay - BeaudetLost 12
L#1 DoublesColleen Bresson / Marie Zinno vs Julie Lenhart / Cheryl Rauch4-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesJane Mills vs Tiffany Moncrieff2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKatrina Tiedge / Valerie Barrett vs Susie Beaudet / Lucy Slaboch0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Melissa Bailey
published
3.62
Mary Huber-Olk
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.52
Natalie Cortese
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.50
Suzie Crews
published
3.44
Marie Zinno
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.39
Colleen Bresson
published 3.5
3.32
Michelle Minor
published
3.23
Karen Romine
published
3.18
Jane Mills
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.11
Pam Davis
published
3.11
Dawn Strang
published 3.5
3.06
Kim Swope Schott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Shirley Yagoda
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Karen Angelis
published
Katrina Tiedge
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Valerie Barrett
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Huber-Olk + Colleen Bresson11363% games+8.9% vs expected
Kim Swope Schott + Marie Zinno6648% gamesnot enough data
Suzie Crews + Marie Zinno8167% gamesnot enough data
Katrina Tiedge + Mary Huber-Olk4261% gamesnot enough data
Marie Zinno + Michelle Minor314 matchesnot enough data
Kim Swope Schott + Katrina Tiedge213 matchesnot enough data
Kim Swope Schott + Mary Huber-Olk213 matchesnot enough data
Jane Mills + Marie Zinno213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melissa Bailey
14W–17L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.63
3.5
Mary Huber-Olk
127W–49L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%19%81%
3.62
3.5
Natalie Cortese
144W–71L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
3.52
Suzie Crews
18W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
3.50
Marie Zinno
66W–37L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Colleen Bresson
15W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.39
Michelle Minor
19W–16L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
Karen Romine
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Jane Mills
105W–100L career · 4 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Pam Davis
2W–20L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Dawn Strang
29W–22L career · type A · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.11
Kim Swope Schott
23W–28L career · 5 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.06
3
Shirley Yagoda
155W–105L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.89
Karen Angelis
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Katrina Tiedge
45W–29L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Valerie Barrett
57W–71L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.