Teams

Handley

2019 One Doubles · 4.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 4.17 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Darci Keljo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
Lisa Handley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.61
Geraldine Carter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Results8 ties
2019-08-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesStephanie Leeding / Lisa Handley vs Carrie Fisher / Cheryl Roloff6-0, 6-2
2019-07-24Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDarci Keljo / Stephanie Leeding vs Mary Hlady / Raini Spitze5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2019-07-23Won 10
W#1 DoublesDarci Keljo / Nikki Metcalf vs Julie Hansen / Amy Graham5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2019-07-14Won 10
W#1 DoublesDarci Keljo / Geraldine Carter vs Bin He / Jalaja Uppili6-2, 7-5
2019-06-23Won 10
W#1 DoublesDarci Keljo / Lisa Handley vs Flor Harrigan / Rie Sasakawa6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2019-06-21Won 10
W#1 DoublesStephanie Leeding / Lisa Handley vs Kristi Vargas / Julie Hester6-2, 6-4
2019-06-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesStephanie Leeding / Geraldine Carter vs Brandy Horwitz / Kirsten Giacomini6-3, 6-1
2019-06-09Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Handley / Nikki Metcalf vs Claire Thayer / Maria Kosmetatos6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Darci Keljo
55W–36L career
0%97%3%
3.87
4.5
Lisa Handley
41W–32L career
56%44%0%
3.84
4
Geraldine Carter
29W–28L career
20%80%1%
3.61

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.