Teams

TRC:Meet Your Match:Lima/Dalaker

2023 SCT Adult 18 & Over COMBO (Women) - Winter · 5.5 Women - Weekend (1

12 players · average NTRP 2.67 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-12-04vs NC:Super Deuces:Eldredge/KelleherLost 12
L#1 DoublesJudy Dalaker / Donna Bowers vs Erin Kanter / KATHERINE KELLEHER3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKristen Scully / Marie Lima vs Shaz Kahng / Amy Miller6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesHeather Callanan / Deborah Nicolson vs Teresa Haughey / Pallavi Debnath2-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesTammy Cook / Donna Bowers vs Alison Blicharz / Erica Winkler0-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMarie Lima / Kristen Scully vs Jill Brant / Meryl Gold6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJudy Dalaker / Victoria Jensen vs Debra Miller / Michele Markelon2-6, 5-5
2022-11-13vs 4S:Combo 5.5:TwissWon 30
W#1 DoublesTammy Cook / Donna Bowers vs Sara Lebovitz / Laura Rowley6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJudy Dalaker / Victoria Jensen vs Linda Gross / Donna Lempit6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMarie Lima / Heather Callanan vs Diana Traska / Susan Wood6-3, 6-3
2022-10-16vs MIT:Spintastic:BuschauerWon 21
L#1 DoublesMarie Lima / Kristen Scully vs Emily DeGrand / Megan Collins6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLoralie Held / Heather Callanan vs Karen Dellert / Sheri Pillo7-4, 4-4
W#3 DoublesJudy Dalaker / Victoria Jensen vs Deirdre Chrostowski / Astrid Alvarez Clavijo7-6, 5-4
2022-10-02vs TCT:Highly Strung:Berson/WeissLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarie Lima / Kristen Scully vs Theresa Kelly / Priti Ghatlia4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJudy Dalaker / Donna Bowers vs Chris Bruck / Jillaine Dellis1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHeather Callanan / Tammy Cook vs Helen Brickfield / Carolyn Dow5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-09-17vs WRC:We Be Slicin:MarcusSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKristen Scully / Marie Lima vs Elizabeth Zeppernick / Jennifer Agnes4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDonna Bowers / Tammy Cook vs Amy Lang / Jaime Booth3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 5.5 Women - Weekend (1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TCT:Highly Strung:Berson/Weiss0614412141
2NC:Super Deuces:Eldredge/Kelleher0612612119
3WRC:We Be Slicin:Marcus0612613133
4TRC:Meet Your Match:Lima/Dalaker0610817148
54S:Combo 5.5:Twiss0661224164
6MIT:Spintastic:Buschauer0641428188
7FIT:Fairfield Dropshots:Brant/Meskin0651328182

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.43 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Kristen Scully
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.50
Donna Bowers
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.38
Kimberly Grosso
published
2.35
Deborah Nicolson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Denise Arpino
published 2.5
2.23
Loralie Held
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.14
Judy Dalaker
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Heather Callanan
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Kristin DeWitt
published
Marie Lima
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sarom Ta
published
Victoria Jensen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marie Lima + Judy Dalaker9649% games−4.4% vs expected
Judy Dalaker + Loralie Held1834% games−7.6% vs expected
Loralie Held + Kimberly Grosso1538% games−9.4% vs expected
Marie Lima + Loralie Held2535% gamesnot enough data
Donna Bowers + Loralie Held2441% gamesnot enough data
Deborah Nicolson + Judy Dalaker0532% gamesnot enough data
Victoria Jensen + Judy Dalaker2341% gamesnot enough data
Donna Bowers + Judy Dalaker0529% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristen Scully
65W–50L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Donna Bowers
15W–55L career · type A · 5 lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
2.50
Kimberly Grosso
16W–26L career · no lines in 2023
0%82%18%
2.38
2.5
Deborah Nicolson
29W–64L career · 1 line in 2023
0%87%13%
2.35
2.5
Denise Arpino
2W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Loralie Held
18W–45L career · 1 line in 2023
0%98%2%
2.23
Judy Dalaker
21W–47L career · 5 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Heather Callanan
20W–24L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kristin DeWitt
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Marie Lima
31W–56L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sarom Ta
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Victoria Jensen
14W–29L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.