Teams

MIT:Spintastic:Buschauer

2023 SCT Adult 18 & Over COMBO (Women) - Winter · 5.5 Women - Weekend (1

13 players · average NTRP 2.75 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-12-04vs 4S:Combo 5.5:TwissLost 02
L#1 DoublesPatricia Decker / Megan Collins vs Lorraine Catalano / Maureen Ireland2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTami Siriwardene / Astrid Alvarez Clavijo vs Stephanie Cahill / Laura Rowley1-6, 6-7
W#1 DoublesTami Siriwardene / Deirdre Chrostowski vs Jill Brant / Kathy Reale7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesPatricia Decker / Astrid Alvarez Clavijo vs Jen Landolt / Suzanne Duval6-1, 6-2
2022-10-30vs TCT:Highly Strung:Berson/WeissLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren Dellert / Emily DeGrand vs Audrey Gonzalez / Debbie Harrison4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDeirdre Chrostowski / Tami Siriwardene vs Theresa Kelly / Radhika Agrawal5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesVesna Buntak / Patricia Decker vs Jillaine Dellis / Maria Levin1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-10-16vs TRC:Meet Your Match:Lima/DalakerLost 12
W#1 DoublesEmily DeGrand / Megan Collins vs Marie Lima / Kristen Scully3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Dellert / Sheri Pillo vs Loralie Held / Heather Callanan4-7, 4-4
L#3 DoublesDeirdre Chrostowski / Astrid Alvarez Clavijo vs Judy Dalaker / Victoria Jensen6-7, 4-5
2022-10-02vs WRC:We Be Slicin:MarcusLost 03
L#1 DoublesEmily DeGrand / Patricia Decker vs Eliza Doolittle / Natalia White5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDeirdre Chrostowski / Karen Dellert vs Elizabeth Zeppernick / Anne Marcus2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAlyson Rourke / Tami Siriwardene vs Leni Kessler / Marta Mihelic2-6, 2-6
2022-09-17vs NC:Super Deuces:Eldredge/KelleherLost 03
L#1 DoublesDeirdre Chrostowski / Vesna Buntak vs Erin Kanter / Claudia Gill1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMegan Collins / Tami Siriwardene vs Teresa Haughey / Tracy Doka1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAstrid Alvarez Clavijo / Karen Dellert vs Shaz Kahng / Laura Burdick1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 5.5 Women - Weekend (1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TCT:Highly Strung:Berson/Weiss0614412141
2NC:Super Deuces:Eldredge/Kelleher0612612119
3WRC:We Be Slicin:Marcus0612613133
4TRC:Meet Your Match:Lima/Dalaker0610817148
54S:Combo 5.5:Twiss0661224164
6MIT:Spintastic:Buschauer0641428188
7FIT:Fairfield Dropshots:Brant/Meskin0651328182

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Emily DeGrand
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.94
Megan Collins
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.83
Jenny Buschauer
published
2.81
Deirdre Chrostowski
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.63
Sheri Pillo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.42
Tami Siriwardene
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.42
Patricia Decker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.38
Astrid Alvarez Clavijo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Alyson Rourke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.89
Karen Dellert
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Jennifer Billock
published
Jennifer Stowell
published
Vesna Buntak
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenny Buschauer + Emily DeGrand221456% games+10.8% vs expected
Tami Siriwardene + Astrid Alvarez Clavijo4645% games+6.4% vs expected
Tami Siriwardene + Alyson Rourke7646% games+1.1% vs expected
Jenny Buschauer + Sheri Pillo5355% games−1.1% vs expected
Sheri Pillo + Deirdre Chrostowski2546% games−7.6% vs expected
Emily DeGrand + Deirdre Chrostowski2344% gamesnot enough data
Tami Siriwardene + Karen Dellert134 matchesnot enough data
Emily DeGrand + Sheri Pillo224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Emily DeGrand
70W–48L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
2.98
Megan Collins
20W–29L career · 3 lines in 2023
68%32%<1%
2.94
Jenny Buschauer
71W–67L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.83
3
Deirdre Chrostowski
96W–87L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%92%8%
2.81
Sheri Pillo
50W–36L career · 1 line in 2023
17%83%<1%
2.63
Tami Siriwardene
51W–57L career · 5 lines in 2023
0%73%27%
2.42
Patricia Decker
29W–29L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%74%26%
2.42
2.5
Astrid Alvarez Clavijo
34W–45L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%83%17%
2.38
2.5
Alyson Rourke
12W–20L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Karen Dellert
8W–30L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.89
Jennifer Billock
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Stowell
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Vesna Buntak
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.