Teams

FD 7.0 PM1 Leohr

2025 NEOTA Fusion Doubles · NEOTA 18&O 7.0 Fusion Doubles

12 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings13 teams · NEOTA 18&O 7.0 Fusion Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1FD 7.0 LT Fiedler902439166
2FD 7.0 NC1 Bullach9023410152
3FD 7.0 MM1 Mei7120411158
4FD 7.0 MV1 Connell53141024198
5FD 7.0 NC2 Williams54161124210
6FD 7.0 PM2 Nita54151232245
7FD 7.0 AO Pecko4491536242
8FD 7.0 CC Meisenbach45141332257
9FD 7.0 BR Timken45101738271
10FD 7.0 MV2 Jolibois35121226181
11FD 7.0 MM2 Wachspress1751938239
12FD 7.0 PM1 Leohr0942347296
13FD 7.0 TP Voris0922552310

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Brian Lonsway
published 3.5
3.37
Bill Balzarini
published 3.5
3.31
Jerry Kozik
published
3.31
Jill Lengel
published
3.23
Andy Brouse
published 3.5
3.21
Taylor Leohr
published
3.03
Marcela Nicolae
published
3.01
LIsa Haynes
published
3.00
Michelle Kleppel
published
2.82
Tavi Muresan
published
2.78
Bonita Teeuwen
published 3.5
2.72
Bogdan Nicolae
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Kleppel + Jill Lengel6752% games−1.8% vs expected
LIsa Haynes + Taylor Leohr141354% games−2.3% vs expected
Michelle Kleppel + Bonita Teeuwen5257% games−2.5% vs expected
Jill Lengel + Bonita Teeuwen8553% games−5.8% vs expected
Taylor Leohr + Bonita Teeuwen314 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Kleppel + Taylor Leohr123 matchesnot enough data
Taylor Leohr + Jill Lengel213 matchesnot enough data
Jill Lengel + Marcela Nicolae303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brian Lonsway
71W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.55
3.5
Bill Balzarini
68W–41L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
Jerry Kozik
69W–45L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Jill Lengel
116W–84L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Andy Brouse
30W–22L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Taylor Leohr
50W–38L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Marcela Nicolae
138W–52L career · no lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
LIsa Haynes
28W–25L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.01
Michelle Kleppel
41W–39L career · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
Tavi Muresan
33W–30L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3.5
Bonita Teeuwen
130W–96L career · no lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.78
3
Bogdan Nicolae
39W–31L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.